lucy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Karman <pe...@peknet.com>
Subject Re: [lucy-dev] Build from top dir
Date Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:41:10 GMT
Chris Hostetter wrote on 12/7/10 8:29 PM:

> 1) Although the lucene release haven't really set a good example of this, 
> the mantra Juka has always evangalized that i've come to appreciate is 
> that the "source" release should essentially be "svn export | tar | gzip"
> 

+1

> 2) The source release is all that matters, it's the only thing that *must* 
> be voted on.
> 

in that light, I think this thread is moot.

Am I wrong?


> 
> i wouldn't jump through any hoops trying to organize the code in some 
> convoluted way just for the sake of trying to simplify the release voting 
> -- if you want to to keep the vote simple, make the source release 
> artificats clean, clear, well documented and easy to "build"
> 
> If it makes sense for the Lucy build to have 200 different binary 
> artifacts targeted at diff languages, so be it - the important thing is 
> that every one of those binary packages needs to be reproducable by anyone 
> with the source release, the build documentation, and a copy of the 
> neccessary dependencies.
> 

+1

-- 
Peter Karman  .  http://peknet.com/  .  peter@peknet.com

Mime
View raw message