lucy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Karman <>
Subject Re: [lucy-dev] X.Y.Z version number feasibility
Date Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:48:03 GMT
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on 12/3/10 10:36 AM:

> What's the legitimate concern here with using my suggestion with C (Lucy's primary API

I the main issue isn't about language-specific limitations or not. Just using
consistent patterns.

i.e., preferring 1.0.0 instead of 1.0 so that when the micro version gets bumped
the pattern is always X.Y.Z.

I like that. Makes it easier to write code in any language if the pattern is
more predictable.

Peter Karman  .  .

View raw message