lucy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Karman <pe...@peknet.com>
Subject Re: [lucy-dev] X.Y.Z version numbers and stable forks
Date Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:29:10 GMT
Marvin Humphrey wrote on 12/2/10 6:00 PM:

> Instead, I think we should advance the minor version whenever it's
> appropriate, and just spin off stable forks whenever it makes sense.  Here's
> how things might play out:
> 
>     Lucy 0.1.0
>     Lucy 0.1.1
>     Lucy 0.2.0
>     Lucy 0.2.1
>     Lucy 0.2.2
>                 Lucy1 1.0.0
>     Lucy 0.3.0
>     Lucy 0.4.0
>     Lucy 0.4.1
>                 Lucy2 2.0.0
>     Lucy 0.5.0
>     Lucy 0.6.0
>     ...
>     Lucy 0.10.0
>     Lucy 0.11.0
>     Lucy 0.11.1
>                 Lucy3 3.0.0
>     Lucy 0.12.0
>     ...
> 
> While there's no urgency until we get to our second release, I thought it was
> worthwhile to explore this issue prior to adopting X.Y.Z version numbers.
> 

+!

that seems saner, to go the asynchronous route. anyone who cares about only
using an API-stable fork won't care what version maps to trunk.


-- 
Peter Karman  .  http://peknet.com/  .  peter@peknet.com

Mime
View raw message