Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucenenet-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucenenet-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3DD4185A8 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87579 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2016 10:03:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucenenet-user-archive@lucenenet.apache.org Received: (qmail 87536 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2016 10:03:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@lucenenet.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@lucenenet.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@lucenenet.apache.org Received: (qmail 87524 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2016 10:03:14 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 10:03:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DE40B18048D for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:03:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.304 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.304 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.554, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rOmjKsgg45DC for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC2S30.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s30.hotmail.com [65.55.111.105]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 774192026F for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU404-EAS204 ([65.55.111.73]) by BLU004-OMC2S30.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 02:02:58 -0800 X-TMN: [kUuylpa4eLzq9OvirGBrRmmU4PmsUe3k] X-Originating-Email: [geobmx540@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Prescott Nasser To: CC: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: UAP Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 02:02:31 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQABAgME0LSROarZP3FBiQyFURJyywCqn/Fiool5gLA= Content-Language: en-us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2016 10:02:58.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BA3ADF0:01D14869] Resending with Damien in the CC in case he isn't subscribed to the = mailing list -----Original Message----- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx540@hotmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:01 AM To: user@lucenenet.apache.org Subject: RE: UAP The bad news is the PCL branch was never completed. It was an = experimental port that kind of never made it very far. I think it was = me... Ran into issues I think with using volatile keyword in a WP8 = world. We're making some pretty good progress on the current 4.8 release. I = can't say that I've tried, but you might consider pulling that down (I = think we are working master) and seeing how close to compiling that = becomes. -----Original Message----- From: Damien Gu=C3=A9rin [mailto:dguerin@sqli.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 1:56 AM To: user@lucenenet.apache.org Subject: UAP Hi everyone, i would like to use Lucene.net in a UAP application but it is currently = impossible because Lucene.net works only with .Net framework for Desktop = app. To be able to do it i tried to build Lucene.net from the PCL = branch, but it is impossible. I don't understand how it is possible to = build because there are a lot of files that are missing (Store namespace = for example). Anyone has already do that? Thanks in advance for your response. Best regards,