lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Lewis <witchlightn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Last failing tests remain to fix!
Date Tue, 02 Jun 2015 01:32:58 GMT
I'm curious about how it's going.

Cheers,
James



On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
wrote:

> We are now working on the last 5-10 failing tests in core. Still some code
> left to port though.
> On May 10, 2015 5:37 PM, "James Lewis" <witchlightning@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It seems it was on the verge a couple of of weeks ago. I'm wondering how
> > it's going.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > James
> > On Apr 21, 2015 6:06 AM, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <itamar@code972.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Status update:
> > >
> > > We are down to about 20 failing tests (thanks Laimis!)
> > >
> > > #1 + #2 are both fixed. Still more isolated tests left, and are up for
> > > grabs.
> > >
> > > I'm currently working on the Analysis.Common sub-project, as it is a
> > > prerequisite for a release (we can't release core without a proper
> > analysis
> > > package).
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <
> itamar@code972.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > We are nearly there -- we are this close to a release!
> > > >
> > > > We have only about 30 failing tests now in the core, and I'd like to
> > push
> > > > hard during the next few days so we can get a beta out next week.
> > > >
> > > > I'd appreciate your help with this!
> > > >
> > > > I've narrowed down several failing tests that require some digging,
> if
> > > > folks can assign those to themselves and send us PRs fixing those
> > tests,
> > > > that would help a lot!
> > > >
> > > > 1. Lucene.Net.Search.TestNumericRangeQuery32.TestInfiniteValues()
> > > > and Lucene.Net.Search.TestNumericRangeQuery64.TestInfiniteValues() --
> > > > specifically it seems like Double and Float NaNs are treated
> > differently
> > > > between C# and Java and therefore the failing tests. Or there is a
> bug
> > in
> > > > the inner implementation handling those queries.
> > > >
> > > > 2. TestLucene40DocValuesFormat has a few failing tests, probably
> > exposing
> > > > data corruption in one of the codec components. I believe this is
> > > contained
> > > > in the 40DocValues tests so the scope isn't huge but I could be
> wrong.
> > > >
> > > > 3. TestLucene42DocValuesFormat has two tests failing with output of
> > lines
> > > > like "Fail: frozenHash=182658 vs h=5124052". Something is off in
> > > computing
> > > > the hashes of the nodes, or maybe the node construction is faulty
> > (which
> > > is
> > > > a serious bug). Hashing is done in Lucene.Net.Fst.NodeHash<T>,
> that'll
> > > be a
> > > > good starting point. Also see
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/ea7cfe6972972f91090d995c729689fff9a0f54c
> > > >
> > > > 4. There seem to be some concurrency issues with file handling,
> > probably
> > > > on the part that is in charge of acquiring and releasing locks. In
> > > > particular see TestDocValuesFormat,
> > > > .TestShardSearching.TestSimple(),
> > > TestBufferedIndexInput.TestSetBufferSize(),
> > > TestLockFactory.TestStressLocks(),
> > > TestLockFactory.TestStressLocksNativeFSLockFactory()
> > > >
> > > > 5. RegexpQuery seems to be broken, I believe the underlying automaton
> > > > implementation doesn't emit the terms correctly. See the failures in
> > > > TestRegexpQuery and TestRegexpRandom.
> > > >
> > > > 6. Similar but probably unrelated failing test is
> > > > at TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper.TestFuzzy2()
> > > >
> > > > 7. An interesting failure to investigate is here:
> > > > TestIndexableBinaryStringTools.TestEncodedSortability() -- probably a
> > > > simple porting fail, a subtle Java <--> C# mismatch that we haven't
> > > noticed.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, any help with porting the subprojects would be great.
> > Some
> > > > folks took some subprojects under their wings and never reported
> back.
> > If
> > > > you could either complete the work, or donate whatever you have done
> so
> > > > far, that would be great.
> > > >
> > > > As always, get the code from here:
> https://github.com/apache/lucenenet
> > > --
> > > > work on your fork and send us a PR when ready, with a good
> description
> > of
> > > > what you've done.
> > > >
> > > > To see the list of currently failing tests in real-time, go here (you
> > can
> > > > login as guest):
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewType.html?buildTypeId=LuceneNet_Core&branch_LuceneNet=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, and happy searching,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message