lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Last failing tests remain to fix!
Date Sun, 10 May 2015 21:27:57 GMT
We are now working on the last 5-10 failing tests in core. Still some code
left to port though.
On May 10, 2015 5:37 PM, "James Lewis" <witchlightning@gmail.com> wrote:

> It seems it was on the verge a couple of of weeks ago. I'm wondering how
> it's going.
>
> Cheers,
> James
> On Apr 21, 2015 6:06 AM, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <itamar@code972.com> wrote:
>
> > Status update:
> >
> > We are down to about 20 failing tests (thanks Laimis!)
> >
> > #1 + #2 are both fixed. Still more isolated tests left, and are up for
> > grabs.
> >
> > I'm currently working on the Analysis.Common sub-project, as it is a
> > prerequisite for a release (we can't release core without a proper
> analysis
> > package).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> >
> > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <itamar@code972.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > We are nearly there -- we are this close to a release!
> > >
> > > We have only about 30 failing tests now in the core, and I'd like to
> push
> > > hard during the next few days so we can get a beta out next week.
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate your help with this!
> > >
> > > I've narrowed down several failing tests that require some digging, if
> > > folks can assign those to themselves and send us PRs fixing those
> tests,
> > > that would help a lot!
> > >
> > > 1. Lucene.Net.Search.TestNumericRangeQuery32.TestInfiniteValues()
> > > and Lucene.Net.Search.TestNumericRangeQuery64.TestInfiniteValues() --
> > > specifically it seems like Double and Float NaNs are treated
> differently
> > > between C# and Java and therefore the failing tests. Or there is a bug
> in
> > > the inner implementation handling those queries.
> > >
> > > 2. TestLucene40DocValuesFormat has a few failing tests, probably
> exposing
> > > data corruption in one of the codec components. I believe this is
> > contained
> > > in the 40DocValues tests so the scope isn't huge but I could be wrong.
> > >
> > > 3. TestLucene42DocValuesFormat has two tests failing with output of
> lines
> > > like "Fail: frozenHash=182658 vs h=5124052". Something is off in
> > computing
> > > the hashes of the nodes, or maybe the node construction is faulty
> (which
> > is
> > > a serious bug). Hashing is done in Lucene.Net.Fst.NodeHash<T>, that'll
> > be a
> > > good starting point. Also see
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/ea7cfe6972972f91090d995c729689fff9a0f54c
> > >
> > > 4. There seem to be some concurrency issues with file handling,
> probably
> > > on the part that is in charge of acquiring and releasing locks. In
> > > particular see TestDocValuesFormat,
> > > .TestShardSearching.TestSimple(),
> > TestBufferedIndexInput.TestSetBufferSize(),
> > TestLockFactory.TestStressLocks(),
> > TestLockFactory.TestStressLocksNativeFSLockFactory()
> > >
> > > 5. RegexpQuery seems to be broken, I believe the underlying automaton
> > > implementation doesn't emit the terms correctly. See the failures in
> > > TestRegexpQuery and TestRegexpRandom.
> > >
> > > 6. Similar but probably unrelated failing test is
> > > at TestSpanMultiTermQueryWrapper.TestFuzzy2()
> > >
> > > 7. An interesting failure to investigate is here:
> > > TestIndexableBinaryStringTools.TestEncodedSortability() -- probably a
> > > simple porting fail, a subtle Java <--> C# mismatch that we haven't
> > noticed.
> > >
> > > Additionally, any help with porting the subprojects would be great.
> Some
> > > folks took some subprojects under their wings and never reported back.
> If
> > > you could either complete the work, or donate whatever you have done so
> > > far, that would be great.
> > >
> > > As always, get the code from here: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet
> > --
> > > work on your fork and send us a PR when ready, with a good description
> of
> > > what you've done.
> > >
> > > To see the list of currently failing tests in real-time, go here (you
> can
> > > login as guest):
> > >
> >
> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewType.html?buildTypeId=LuceneNet_Core&branch_LuceneNet=%3Cdefault%3E&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv
> > >
> > > Thanks, and happy searching,
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko
> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant
> > > Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message