lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Status and call for participation
Date Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:23:12 GMT
Sounds cool. Easnt aware of that.

What do other ppl think?
On Nov 19, 2014 10:09 AM, "Rob Vesse" <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:

> On the note of the dev list one thing you guys could do since you seem to
> be using GitHub heavily for collaboration is to ask Infra to set up the
> ASF-GitHub integration:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_an
> d
>
> This will provide visibility of dev activities occurring on GitHub and
> makes it clearer that there is activity going on.
>
> Rob
>
> On 18/11/2014 17:27, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <itamar@code972.com> wrote:
>
> >You are correct. That thread is more of a pulse check and PMC revival, we
> >should definitely move it here (we would like to generate some noise on
> >the
> >user list until the project is stable enough to start using the dev list
> >again). /cc @Prescott
> >
> >--
> >
> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Comment inline:
> >>
> >> On 14/11/2014 15:21, "Itamar Syn-Hershko" <itamar@code972.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >Just a quick recap of the last couple of weeks.
> >> >
> >> >We have started the process of working towards Lucene.NET 4.8, which
> >>will
> >> >conform to Java Lucene 4.8.0 (with a quick patch later to bring it up
> >>to
> >> >speed with 4.8.1).
> >>
> >> It is great to hear that significant progress is being made on the port
> >>
> >> >
> >> >The changes from the current Lucene.NET version (which is 3.0.3) are
> >>huge.
> >> >The project structure is different, the capabilities and features are
> >>new.
> >> >It's practically a different project.
> >> >
> >> >As such, we are trying to revamp our process as well, to be more agile
> >>and
> >> >trying to heal the community and project while at it. We have a private
> >> >thread going on to think of ways we can do that, one of them is to
> >> >reinstate the PMC, and more is coming.
> >>
> >> Unless there is actually anything sensitive being discussed (security
> >> issues, personnel issues like new committers/PMC members, trademark
> >> enforcement etc) the project should always be discussing in the open.
> >>
> >> You can't involve the community if you start by excluding them from the
> >> discussion.
> >>
> >> Part of the Apache way is "if it didn't happen on the dev list, it
> >>didn't
> >> happen"
> >>
> >> Rob
> >>
> >> >
> >> >The new sources are here for you to experiment with:
> >> >https://github.com/apache/lucene.net
> >> >
> >> >The Core project is almost entirely ported including all tests, and we
> >> >have
> >> >most of the tests green. We have more sub-projects (like Facet,
> >>Queries,
> >> >Analysis, Codecs and more) in the middle of the porting process and
> >>should
> >> >have them out of the door soon as well.
> >> >
> >> >Feel free to try it all out - we would love to have more hands on deck
> >>for
> >> >testing and fixing the last remaining tests!
> >> >
> >> >We are also working on a CI pipeline, on a TeamCity instance provided
> >>by
> >> >CodeBetter and JetBrains here:
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverv
> >>i
> >> >ew
> >> >
> >> >We are very interested in hearing from you, and hope to see interest
> >>and
> >> >participation grow as we move ahead. We will be sharing more as more
> >> >happens!
> >> >
> >> >Cheers,
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >Itamar Syn-Hershko
> >> >http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
> >> >Freelance Developer & Consultant
> >> >Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message