lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Itamar Syn-Hershko <ita...@code972.com>
Subject Re: Parity between Lucene.Net and the original
Date Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:50:19 GMT
What Todd said. In particular, Lucene.NET is currently in par with Java
Lucene 3.0.3 and work is being done on 4.8.0 compatibility.

--

Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko>
Freelance Developer & Consultant
Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/>

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Todd Carrico <Todd.Carrico@match.com>
wrote:

> My understanding is that Solr extends lucene.  Not lucene.net, but the
> original Java project.  Solr being easier to work with, and has added
> features using lucene as a base.
>
> Lucene.net is a port of the Java project and is behind the Java version.
> It is close enough in implementation that the Java docs for lucene.java
> work for lucene.net.
>
> tc
>
> > On Oct 12, 2014, at 6:24 AM, Michael O'Shea <michael.a.oshea@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > People,
> >
> > I was looking into Solr in Azure but then came across Lucene.Net which
> > seems to be a better fit for the architecture of my project in Azure.
> >
> > I'm reading up on the material available at various resources but I'm not
> > finding the answers I need.
> >
> > I haven't been able to find if/how Lucene supports these features :
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Language+Analysis
> >
> > I've downloaded the full source code from github and looked into it but
> am
> > also having no luck.
> >
> > Is there a howto somewhere that would show how Lucene.Net does these
> things
> > ?
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Michael O'Shea
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message