lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Cecil <rob.ce...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: SPAM-HIGH: Disparity between API usage and Luke
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:48:07 GMT
Same results, apparently, when I use Luke 1.0.1.

When I search for "Id:BAUER*" I get 15 hits in Luke, but in my custom app,
zero.

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Rob Vesse <rvesse@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:

> You appear to be using Luke 3.5 which per the information on the Luke
> homepage (http://code.google.com/p/luke/) uses Lucene 3.5
>
> Since Lucene.Net is currently on 2.9.4 I wouldn't be surprised to see
> different behavior between the API and executing in Luke.
>
> If you use a version of Luke which more closely aligns with the version of
> Lucene.Net (Luke 1.0.1 uses Lucene 3.0.1 which should be close enough
> since the 2.9.x releases were previews of the 3.0.x releases as I
> understood it) what behavior do you see?
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Rob
>
> On 6/26/12 10:50 AM, "Rob Cecil" <rob.cecil@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >If I run a query against my index using QueryParser to query a field:
> >
> >                var query = _parser.Parse("Id:BAUER*");
> >                var topDocs = searcher.Search(query, 10);
> >                Assert.AreEqual(count, topDocs.TotalHits);
> >
> >I get 0 for my TotalHits, yet in Luke, the same query phrase yields 15
> >results, what am I doing wrong? I use the StandardAnalyzer both to
> >create the index and to query.
> >
> >The field is defined as:
> >
> >new Field("Id", myObject.Id, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED)
> >
> >and is a string field. The result set back from Luke looks like
> >(screencap):
> >
> >http://screencast.com/t/NooMK2Rf
> >
> >Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message