Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-lucene-net-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-lucene-net-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F8F38680 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56938 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2011 10:08:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-lucene-net-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56906 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2011 10:08:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56897 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2011 10:08:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:08:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of digydigy@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gy0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:08:12 +0000 Received: by gyc15 with SMTP id 15so2803091gyc.35 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:07:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=L4RjiaBJOhLNJauA/QF6WRzvcOmR3TPCDlmuYByqr18=; b=haR64yiNKgoJEGqyyyc3pO2u80Gh3P9MyX/euK5mWk/gM55DaTu2Sv/qowNlnW3ToR LfM0UWFFJt2S8zO1URq5nxIzabS3rHfeahRk4I/Ybsg0q5ioyA5w6PByQ0sYLhpCRnlt TmBWI5dPQXJUqYOdNJ0LNRSly1jtj/u+ugvjk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.73.72 with SMTP id r8mr110704icj.128.1316081271119; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.224.5 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:07:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:07:51 +0300 Message-ID: From: digy digy To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8512a91f0604acf80cb3 Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Indexing speed result of RAMDirectory MMapDirectory FSDirectory --90e6ba6e8512a91f0604acf80cb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There must be something wrong. I can index 18,000,000 docs in ~20 mins :) DIGY On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Floyd Wu wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm doing a little test to find out what is the better implementation > for my situation. > > I'm indexing 18,000 docs and using 3 different Directory > implementation but result shows that > > RAMDiretory --> 22 minutes > FSDirectory--> 24 minutes > MMapDirectory --> 24 minutes > > I wonder why RAMDirectory doesn't win over others? Can someone explain > this? > > Floyd > --90e6ba6e8512a91f0604acf80cb3--