lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:19:33 GMT
I agree, a line by line is of little use to me.

Sent from my Windows Phone

-----Original Message-----
From: Kieran Logan
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:15 PM
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?



> Hi Scott
> 
> Can only speak for my own interests. The line-by-line port is not of
> interest or to put it another way, I would consider a .Net 4 version which
> uses the framework optimally of far greater interest than a line-by-line
> port. 
> 
> Kieran
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardenator@gmail.com] 
> Sent: 29 June 2011 19:58
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
> 
>  
> 
> After the large community response about moving the code base from .Net 2.0
> to Net 4.0 I am trying to figure out what is the need for a line-by-line
> port.  Starting with Digy's excellent work on the conversion to generics a
> priority of the 2.9.4g release is the 2 packages would not be
> interchangeable.  So faster turnaround from a java release won't matter to
> non line-by-line users they will have to wait until the updates are made to
> the non line-by-line code base.  
> 
>  
> 
> My question is there really a user base for the line-by-line port?  Anyone
> have a comment?
> 
>  
> 
> Scott
> 
>  
> 
>   
> 
>  
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message