Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gusa98@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Lg6v/JYZKSFoCU+3XabwGRuYsv3/WXojq7Ep6WSFMKetoYAZ1i5msIfNU/2mxDQC1v
         tPMjZB9dnJGn3T6DmUfHhk6I2o2YisATzN+vS7ZFiF1laXk6uWDQ3SlXJmIvtO98kT6p
         Kq+WAJfgs7+WwMW08lQwwoELsoL0l3RbPcsXY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <003d01cc0ed3$790bb340$6b2319c0$@agilepartner.net>
References: <BANLkTimNb0QaZk+pKprFTJLo8MTY8RwfuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<003d01cc0ed3$790bb340$6b2319c0$@agilepartner.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 22:50:38 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTiktpa0QOuijL2S7=Vy9faK8cVA5yA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gustavo Sandrigo <gusa98@gmail.com>
To: lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f1d8761ea08904a2e5898b
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
 Lucene.Net 2.9.4

--001485f1d8761ea08904a2e5898b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Samuel Scholtes <sscholtes@agilepartner.net
> wrote:

> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> Sent: lundi 9 mai 2011 22:05
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.9.4
>
> All,
>
> Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
>
> The question on the table is:
>
> Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the .Net
> 2.0 Framework?
>
> Some options are:
>
> [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
> support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more important
> than backwards compatibility.
> [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
> and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to include
> support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
> compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
> complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
> [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
> compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
>
>
> This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
> users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast their
> votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and
> user mailing lists.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>

--001485f1d8761ea08904a2e5898b--