lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gustavo Sandrigo <gus...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Date Tue, 10 May 2011 05:50:38 GMT
+1

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Samuel Scholtes <sscholtes@agilepartner.net
> wrote:

> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> Sent: lundi 9 mai 2011 22:05
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.9.4
>
> All,
>
> Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
>
> The question on the table is:
>
> Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the .Net
> 2.0 Framework?
>
> Some options are:
>
> [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop
> support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more important
> than backwards compatibility.
> [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches
> and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to include
> support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards
> compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional
> complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals.
> [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards
> compatibility is more important than new features and performance.
>
>
> This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All
> users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast their
> votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and
> user mailing lists.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message