Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucene-net-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 33866 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2009 02:13:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2009 02:13:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 71839 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 02:13:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-lucene-net-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71737 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2009 02:13:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-net-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71697 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2009 02:13:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:13:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luis.francisco.rdg@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-px0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:13:30 +0000 Received: by pxi5 with SMTP id 5so334579pxi.12 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:content-language:thread-index; bh=sCHLJYyIW3fgcqlAnjX2ph5dZ/0+slGbi8vjAwz07NM=; b=WtDK5bO2ZULUrk7bNUZVEGnqco4WjPiv8dXo6sfoB7EP7a/pai77BGKraaSCJSPjBI pCTh+UkUGNuVeFd8EvO5uZcDUM/qbZLjA+wlLtK/5uOBnzFtbmJRbtoUP6iPxAsWo8OS W1XAYb8tWtWqRbNQIvUeY4Hm6ZF4PsVFN/Ol8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:content-language :thread-index; b=RWKET1Y6xItU6Sp/erNDZ41rrFFij6+SDBRyf7dtaODrQ/9l3QvYb3q65ho/23LVFT xZj/ZSd4cPSOnswCI3kJC+JLXdgVIY+/e1N3zC5cJJOSJP6nxdzPCb9VjY1Bvle75Mf3 k1jQRV5PHrzaos1Kt5mj2jOECUkJcg7S9CfLI= Received: by 10.114.19.30 with SMTP id 30mr16573239was.134.1255572788235; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vostro1710 ([189.182.61.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm425981pzk.0.2009.10.14.19.13.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:13:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Luis Fco. Ramirez Daza Gonzalez" To: , References: <16c801ca373f$0bb7c260$23274720$@net> In-Reply-To: <16c801ca373f$0bb7c260$23274720$@net> Subject: RE: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:12:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4ad68530.9713f30a.249b.146c@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: Aco3PwtAwuXjOxbNRZa63Q8LsVazjgV/PcvQ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi George I just want to know the status of the 2.9 port. I'm thinking of trying it because we are using 2.4 and I think we are hitting a bug with the Reopen method. I was looking for a solution and found a thread in the Java JIRA that says the fix wont be ported back to 2.4, but I think it is solved in 2.9 in with a patch: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1453 The reopen function is very important for us because we update the index very often, and right now we have to Close + Open each time we update the index, and because we use custom sort field, we also need to warm up each time we Close+Open, and all that seems to be solved with the Reopen. Thanks Best regards Luis -----Original Message----- From: George Aroush [mailto:george@aroush.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:32 PM To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way Hi folks, This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net. I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have an early release checked-into SVN. If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9 is currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is expected (a bug was found in RC4). My port is based on RC3, but changes between Java Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my port. With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an accumulation of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a chunk release. I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see. Regards, -- George