lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Honeycutt <mbhoneyc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
Date Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:36:25 GMT
Ouch, that still sounds pretty un-fun.  Maybe one day this project will hit
the point where we can stay on top of the porting manually.

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:24 PM, George Aroush <george@aroush.net> wrote:

> This question has came up in the past.  You can search the mailing list for
> my answers.  Here is one,
>
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlca#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22
> +page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+state:results<http://markmail.org/search/?q=jlca#query:jlca%20from%3A%22George%20Aroush%22%0A+page:1+mid:3wylgpsujl2eyic7+state:results>
and another,
> http://markmail.org/message/i2efusv256ay5oxr.
>
> No, I will never do copy / past / build / test / etc.  JLCA, scripts that I
> wrote, and deltas are my best friends for porting (free time is not).
>
> -- George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Honeycutt [mailto:mbhoneycutt@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:09 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
>
> This may be an ignorant question, but what does the porting process
> involve?  My limited experience with porting Java to .NET was porting the
> Weka COBWEB clustering algorithm.  My approach there was very brute-force,
> copy-paste, fix errors, build-and-test, and repeat.   I hope there's a
> better way of doing things when dealing with a large port like this. :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, George Aroush <george@aroush.net> wrote:
>
> > I'm working on it.  It will be another week or so before I have an alpha
> or
> > beta release.  This is talking me longer than previous ports due to 1)
> > considerable new files are added, 2) a good deal of refactoring was
> > introduced in 2.9.
> >
> > I wish I can divide the work of the initial port, and ask the community
> for
> > help, but that's just not possible due to the way initial ports are done.
> >
> > -- George
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Artem Chereisky [mailto:a.chereisky@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:57 AM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Port of Java Lucene 2.9 is under way
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > where can I find the early release of 2.9 port? Is it going to be under
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Art
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:32 PM, George Aroush <george@aroush.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is to let you know that I have begun the porting process of Java
> > > Lucene
> > > 2.9 to Lucene.Net.  I hope in few weeks (maybe even next week) to have
> an
> > > early release checked-into SVN.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you are following Java Lucene mailing list, you will know that 2.9
> is
> > > currently undergoing release as Release Candidate 4 and RC5 is expected
> > (a
> > > bug was found in RC4).  My port is based on RC3, but changes between
> Java
> > > Lucene 2.9 RC3 and soon to come RC5 aren't major to side track my port.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With 2.9 release, we should be able to keep Java Lucene and Lucene.Net
> > > releases very close; my hope is, any further ports should be an
> > > accumulation
> > > of Java Lucene SVN commits ports vs. waiting for a new release to do a
> > > chunk
> > > release.  I'm not sure if this goal can be achieved, but we will see.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- George
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message