lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Honeycutt <mbhoneyc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is Lucene Release 2.3.1 happening in near future ?
Date Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:40:31 GMT
I'd love to help out, too, I'm just not sure how to get started.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Wagner Ignacio Pinto Junior <
wagneripjr@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> I think you are right.
>
>
>
> Maybe the guys need some help, more contributors or committers.
>
>
>
> I managed to port some code from the Java Lucene, the Brazillian analyser,
> to C#.
>
>
>
> I'm new to Lucene.Net but I'm willing to help.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Wagner
>
> > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:39:33 +1000
> > Subject: Re: Is Lucene Release 2.3.1 happening in near future ?
> > From: mitiaguin@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > I know , it is working fine, but my concern was :
> >
> > 1. Seeing formal recent release brings some comfort to people who never
> used
> > it before and in process of making decision to use or not to use
> Lucene.Net
> > 2. Unless a release happens, Lucene.Net will be kept in incubation state
> > which again gives a wrong impression about maturity of this Lucene port.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Wagner Ignacio Pinto Junior <
> > wagneripjr@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'm developing a solution using Lucene 2.3.1 from svn trunk, and Its
> > > working fine
> > >
> > > > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:45:42 +1000
> > > > Subject: Is Lucene Release 2.3.1 happening in near future ?
> > > > From: mitiaguin@gmail.com
> > > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > The questions like that seemed to be asked before and the answer
> seemed
> > > to
> > > > be to check-out code from SVN and that it is quite stable. Will we
> see
> > > one
> > > > day 2.3.1 release in
> > > >
> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download/
> > > >
> > > > as the only release there 2.0.0.4 last modified April 24 2007.
> > > >
> > > > What prevents it from happening - failing tests or something else ?
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message