lucenenet-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Mitiaguin" <mitiag...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Memory leak with sorted searches
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:06:44 GMT
>
>
> Sorry if I've misunderstood but are you talking about re-sorting the hits
> after you've initially retrieved them ordered by relevance?


That's right . It seems to be faster than do it in Lucene.

Michael



>
>
> On 9/27/06, Michael Mitiaguin <mitiaguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Philip,
> >
> > Personally, I found feature a very slow ( comparing to search itself ) ,
> > so
> > I just sort memory collection after iterating Hits.
> > You may have noticed messages regarding memory leak for indexing in .Net
> > 1.1
> > Are you using .Net 1.1  ? I don't remember any memory leak when I used
> it
> > witn .Net 2
> >
> > Regards
> > Michael
> >
> > On 9/28/06, Philip Withington <philip.withington@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm finding that the memory leak problem with sorted searches means
> that
> > I
> > > cannot use this feature of Lucene.Net.  I'm using version 1.9.1.  Is
> > there
> > > a
> > > version out there with a fix for this problem or will it be fixed in a
> > > forthcoming release?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message