Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucenenet-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucenenet-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC15BE98F for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66696 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 09:56:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucenenet-dev-archive@lucenenet.apache.org Received: (qmail 66619 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 09:56:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@lucenenet.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@lucenenet.apache.org Received: (qmail 66609 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2013 09:56:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:56:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.84.128.168] (HELO samaflost.de) (88.84.128.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:56:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by samaflost.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987D028985D4 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:56:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from samaflost.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (v35516.1blu.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MghBF2+S04FK for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:56:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DFC828985D5; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:56:19 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Bodewig To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org Subject: github pull request (was Re: Long-terms plans for supporting .NET 3.5) References: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:56:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Troy Howard's message of "Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:29:32 -0800") Message-ID: <87bocob0ak.fsf_-_@v35516.1blu.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [just going back to the start] On 2013-01-13, Troy Howard wrote: > Part of this is svn vs git, but it's also Github vs ASF's workflow. Pull > requests are great, and Github's interface for that makes things easy. The > idea of having to create a patch and then attach to a JIRA ticket so that a > committer can merge it into a central repo is totally backwards, and IMO > not a modern way of working. The Maven folks are going to embrace PRs to a large extent. I'm not 100% sure what they are doing and how it all works but https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-156 pretty much says: from a legal POV, go ahead and use them. Stefan