From solr-user-return-151379-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Thu Jan 9 13:41:57 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E7EAB18063F for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:41:56 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 19631 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2020 13:41:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 19487 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2020 13:41:51 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:41:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 57C471A3212 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:41:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.013 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.013 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=indiamart.com Received: from mx1-ec2-va.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-mkZ_jmdq-k for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.210.51; helo=mail-ot1-f51.google.com; envelope-from=paras.lehana@indiamart.com; receiver= Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) by mx1-ec2-va.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-ec2-va.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 63669BC563 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so7264033otn.4 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:41:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=indiamart.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3hwCYeH6FocqlNnM7ExBqpqY0kTzSm79FuMy92kqaEc=; b=cHcACT09SS6h5rAdo9Wl6UiU1978xXhLKYsoTo5jwx+XCP0ezvRN4VsN38HHkEzNGd +C5lyvQkOcbm0uf9YaXWqgX8DCtqMILMqim1FzlKxiDpISX6vNfYRFojDAN2K7+TIHG2 DSKBv1YwSwv6H/JOP2XMs/99H8gliPCcJ3g6Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3hwCYeH6FocqlNnM7ExBqpqY0kTzSm79FuMy92kqaEc=; b=rV5wdC9hjd1gh4KJk2HXR6tokTFtpfIH5DyRRAjFFBz5SUeEyY6KGo6db6Mq1RIIn0 50eUo/Ozy2agPeSTLNk/sqUgpWrR6CVlFgHfABYLyW5po9JCcCYWCg05NOq/7tI81L5W k/nqZr+ABE13l9Csu1ua1JzKz54u/97vEWeyADYfhJNmEsxY+1LLN8OJ2cX6e56plNTd cHvCKo8ZRVOEkzua3UNeK2wrU+4e0Pda1TpAQ6DM/Q40JP1eyElmfRzbwmWRWmEwjUuA MrmraAGCJErSs2QQnLvZ/F4xNC/VTw7Ee9VPefjkMNJi9t/Hs4YGavmWaqBwAqmiLPPm mCUw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWGnlVan87mLq3zQppQYVOy9xKzCKojJhs/EBHNtUZ2TocwcaIs 8fH7CjqfWyMJaYruFopau9I+trof7s98T1DpOJlS5oeot06SWfnT3B35bIfu1BIxUrjoSP00vg8 XyxEIxQalaXh2Z3/nGOA9V3EIQtsDKm7KHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwncFUm/2S0BIMmSbvcdk7xpXhY9yRIW8bMvW+fgSzSvbIc9/4PqBBjUFy6b5E0oKG4jFr83jv283Ng46ge9DU= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7501:: with SMTP id r1mr8828566otk.196.1578577306673; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:41:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <256D9A13-F367-40F1-BD24-B935DD8C8DEB@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Paras Lehana Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:11:10 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr 7.5 seed up, accuracy details To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d7068059bb52b41" --0000000000009d7068059bb52b41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I usually keep older and newer Solr versions on different server with same configuration. Then, use jmeter with same parameters and compare the results. Make sure settings like environment settings (JVM, GC) and core configuration (Cache) are in sync and you restart both of them before testing. On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 21:18, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote: > Thank you for the information > Why you are recommending to use the schema api instead of schema xm= l? > > > On Sat, 28 Dec, 2019, 8:01 PM J=C3=B6rn Franke, wr= ote: > > > This highly depends on how you designed your collections etc. - there i= s > > no general answer. You have to do a performance test based on your > > configuration and documents. > > > > I also recommend to check the Solr documentation on how to design a > > collection for 7.x and maybe start even from scratch defining it with a > new > > fresh schema (using the schema api instead of schema.xml and > solrconfig.xml > > etc). You will have anyway to reindex everything so it is a also a good > > opportunity to look at your existing processes and optimize them. > > > > > Am 28.12.2019 um 15:19 schrieb Rajdeep Sahoo < > rajdeepsahoo2012@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > =EF=BB=BFHi all, > > > Is there any way I can get the speed up,accuracy details i.e. > performance > > > improvements of solr 7.5 in comparison with solr 4.6 > > > Currently,we are using solr 4.6 and we are in a process to upgrade t= o > > > solr 7.5. Need these details. > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > --=20 --=20 Regards, *Paras Lehana* [65871] Development Engineer, Auto-Suggest, IndiaMART Intermesh Ltd. 8th Floor, Tower A, Advant-Navis Business Park, Sector 142, Noida, UP, IN - 201303 Mob.: +91-9560911996 Work: 01203916600 | Extn: *8173* --=20 * * --0000000000009d7068059bb52b41--