lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Saurabh Sharma <saurabh.infoe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Edismax ignoring queries containing booleans
Date Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:20:14 GMT
It should work well. I have just tested the same with 8.3.0.

Thanks
Saurabh Sharma

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 4:31 PM Claire Pollard <claire.pollard@imagen.io>
wrote:

> I'm using:
>
> recordID:(18 OR 19 OR 20)
>
> Which should return 2 records (as 18 doesn't exist), but it returns none.
> recordID is a LongPointField (sorry I said Int in my previous message).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saurabh Sharma <saurabh.infoedge@gmail.com>
> Sent: 06 January 2020 10:35
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Edismax ignoring queries containing booleans
>
> Please share the query which you are creating.
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 3:52 PM Claire Pollard <claire.pollard@imagen.io>
> wrote:
>
> > In Solr 8.3.0 I've got an edismax query parser in my search handler,
> > and it seems to be ignoring Boolean operators such as AND and OR when
> > searching using an IntPointField.
> >
> > I was hoping to use a query to this field to return a batch of
> > documents with non-sequential IDs, so a range would be inappropriate.
> >
> > We had a previous 4.10.2 instance of Solr which uses the now
> > deprecated Trie fields, and these seem to search without issue using
> boolean operators.
> >
> > Is there something extra I need to do with my setup for PointFields to
> > use booleans or should they work as default.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Claire.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message