From solr-user-return-150808-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Thu Nov 21 13:16:01 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A428C180660 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:16:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 11858 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2019 13:15:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 11845 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2019 13:15:55 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:15:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 214D5180D7B for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:15:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 596mjZkFharf for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::430; helo=mail-wr1-x430.google.com; envelope-from=gerlowskija@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8F8F57DE1E for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id a15so4337160wrf.9 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:15:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yoJdLQiK10iJ+h53sGOG9oD/DM67kdOFTpafPlmehGo=; b=iRKsQ5Fwhf6Xj3ydF0o4Wb1o9OzH4KwIwC/9mND42lZaarlUm8pI8RFRwQm24AEb+q 7YHEX1e5vu+iWR6FdN7r3u2RPSaApLVqGffnj7ZLdOoYZMGl9PlPM72mMeep1jEIdeVw 56/9OHP8e3Cggo5lnaW5G0lgnGjsMmbBIAmf0Wszv7gZqFwA/5lLNzjQFz3wGktJNwtl LzLzgt111vdFnQinGvlNjTyyiHnp0Tf5CGiOSByyi1NV28wqww4SNuDKIBPtK+tzdNXr oJmIg8d46lLd7leCmgy89+cs/Vexi3Qnw4uBFiQBmYkkIgyX6U0gEpCNMGWQshbWlFR1 poVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=yoJdLQiK10iJ+h53sGOG9oD/DM67kdOFTpafPlmehGo=; b=DxGl7hI/kdpB4wf/IvNU+vfhB7LC5DbTcYm7d9FL4JRMAaRyYyRNf0esCi8AeFw0vF YvFA/C8MH0kV/sprcu297BgjtSZ/v2EnZUAkBjiRySfbJb5pfoufqjAMcRKzgQ9ywpPJ 1om8VBP9yLzFTOEWgF6Q4EUi5mn+43rx/+sy6UNyZ9kTVWfitCxSWbewav2/m46HfsjW 28lLswhf0oxjvr0k3LCZM08eb0OUmhjezyJRkwk5QbxN4bZabG2RTgQ08Mb3D5l/B7Cx 4YkNnrO+7UTxfByz0B5BdKG9c+7a20NPnfJz0McY95vGgQAnTlcnBinY1pmnqvNc4dfX 3qtg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLf1yfRKaBeajmR+Vsgv0QV+C5H/VE4u2u1BY1ecGlibQcPXxa zJ1ebz98zRlSrNZue7174cTJ6FBGHZFEaZ8ftZ0ttQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlox9j7LU9lfUWobfj9jNJbjfSEvnWb9kKj5d6rSg296srcLpo7ixgb0pip1Hxp9dhEVkG66dl1cHxMOXvICQ= X-Received: by 2002:adf:db01:: with SMTP id s1mr9974539wri.372.1574342152929; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 05:15:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jason Gerlowski Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:15:42 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible data corruption in JavaBinCodec in Solr 8.3 during distributed update? To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Very curious what the config change that's related to reproducing this looks like. Maybe it's something that is worth adding test-randomization around? Just thinking aloud.