From solr-user-return-148799-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Thu Jul 11 17:24:49 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB321804BB for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:24:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 29729 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2019 17:24:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 29716 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2019 17:24:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:24:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 719B4180E39 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:24:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.095 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.095 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.294, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KTPILBwEM4kO for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::831; helo=mail-qt1-x831.google.com; envelope-from=erickerickson@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5FA7B7F4F0 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 17:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id x22so218462qtp.12 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:24:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Kmf5vxewnjJ+zBQJz+VOX9nEyPuuyC6lh9HwqTS/hEY=; b=ZhSH5BuLbqzENqVjdJsLfPCPbyeZW1wwmG1DEzve3e/TtwxC8MmFHXylbhNc6HA8Zn BEgiBAepdIhAaQfIc/ufYkF+jYKnQqR/Ek99bsNu6pCYBgLyjEs+JPBYy7ObxCVaDpCA ENCLq5V/A2ty9RTAZ+mGYlmTc6OzjJM8jZ/P8ikERSzLixKzfyMb2UY2z7hmiaJ8CvqS HzcOygprjxWgstNoV0cwGmdUMq0KHp7Ha7eF/YpLc7bOO7qP9+8M+WGXDPkCUGmTJBWy nkHuAdTdzsTwpzJ1R/tmNYncpR0fyFTztgP38qdPeARVm5dHS/8HXjSRYyaT5nQzRotP Yrig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Kmf5vxewnjJ+zBQJz+VOX9nEyPuuyC6lh9HwqTS/hEY=; b=IqiCvJrqxpxzAiP0YeQmq5trOYev6VNPQfjyS7ABq0ATez2ZokH/0Ci1/OBhMWVkwf Dgvoq3rw1sys+LTeFInRDok7RZeThzrP5qRug34VFqGSGsnm0CYytdi4Ie93YVHgLBh6 CGEJyYt1rmN92+Ze4SrnPv3TI/roHC2pxNsvVtzwtIYhO5EyJmUlaXDZJP2+CTn1kJZj jS2mFKKhRECf3/JFM1zJYqpUaodQTi+DGy1u2IMBn8ZRAZpcq7l0xCsC+2LS0nVyIIeE w9jL+zI+tOzAmYSTL6cD5n1ApptZZhakhHX0aaRKk0XePhw6yMLDL9SkpSqLasYP8TTA rvrA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxZeN8MLfR7T9mYOtH8P8GpKMq7NK6yXWMmzLMF4M8pFJHJ9Cp jqx482nHIQxUCQvBPd/dANnWH9cVIZDEABhR+2EFoA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzLGKb9ixNpd4C1OLWpi5m/LgWyvTAWi/rKifTFdA81zaOY/ybGgn59dOQu2oVyDS6XWb+lvB1Wls4TB+IaKc= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:928b:: with SMTP id b11mr2719264qvb.209.1562865872103; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:24:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Erick Erickson Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:24:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: QTime To: solr-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000236d9c058d6b1175" --000000000000236d9c058d6b1175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Not only does Qtime not include network latency, it also doesn't include the time it takes to assemble the docs for return, which can be lengthy when rows is large.. On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, 14:39 Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 7/10/2019 3:17 PM, Lucky Sharma wrote: > > I am seeing one very weird behaviour of QTime of SOLR. > > > > Scenario is : > > When I am hitting the Solr Cloud Instance, situated at a DC with my local > > machine while load test I was seeing 400ms Qtime response and 1sec Http > > Response time. > > How much data was in the response? If it's large, I can see it taking > that long to transfer. This is even more likely if there is a lot of > network latency in the network between the client and the server. > > > While I am trying to do the same process within the same DC location, I > am > > getting 100 ms Solr QTime and 130ms Response Time. > > > > Does QTime counts network latency too?? > > There's no way Solr can include the time to send the response over the > network in QTime. The value is calculated and put into the response > before Solr starts sending. > > Thanks, > Shawn > --000000000000236d9c058d6b1175--