From solr-user-return-148561-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Tue Jun 25 16:47:45 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20A3218062F for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:47:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 43212 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2019 16:47:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 43200 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2019 16:47:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:47:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6B62DC58FC for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:47:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRP1gnbwMwLG for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com (mail-wr1-f43.google.com [209.85.221.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1FB2C60DCA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id r16so18639149wrl.11 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=B2PLnSgcA/EmvQzpDKjRWFy+DFcwo4iRicdONMOF2Mw=; b=VAdeU0tbNtRiL1KzaFNAY0eD7RTX948mXPeSNHnVfHvQs97qwbKzUcBKrSGgLvhT3i vxBByskX14k/vG5/pm901grZS63UX+ZSCaBSjUOaj6zrPCdhjdQp8EoUQob4e4LYcuCN gmuLK6pabaydZkWGnZb+/F2Og+S/zj0PCFtqD9WRw+/S8cklCV1bKOamNhVLSEAmq0Tn O7sFEbWWvaYOOiFWKYS5UMl2G44ZQcGxCjkS6NwLrlsGxpl7H7iEfncr2ZBokS9kRiwN c+hu/HLWqzfaADd+AxkLS+hlVf6c8qCSZTAlPKgY1x0VZLHaEYscUA9IwMiiDLkapuSt txpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=B2PLnSgcA/EmvQzpDKjRWFy+DFcwo4iRicdONMOF2Mw=; b=FpRa6SPNnWnnSBdPWhPxGqS1k4Oi39i9MATmuEBq6oXzEIbm7QO7RgBQUzohM/tc/e uaZrth+Tt6oGqwhFJApUOjCItbuRwtp5iJoz68R5d8CyIbnlU10FnTq0yOPyRlYpdVU0 J2nbK19yXpuisBMT1SZA6GcRuJPoyZfVlZLK/AP2C1fS2JYHWYRx0RodkWKt5FVkhVaw gUWrqePeNmW4BEdeOmxhL0Nn9yPUQUa7Wfv1gT0Tqh5R742dPtFpA5ChVl8N8ISGCSjg JvapoyftcQvlarVga2ze88EFfyywEeY/Z9XIVrsWA165CTIyitcmUQNYt5TzBm4go2ef h1aw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUIee1W6/zxPXsrp6jjvu+FGh4OvCjJrbrp0dA/j0/ybbiHtDBl B7/QYYtFbz+9X/z4ncYTG4nAnVRd X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3/SzzGzqP4ZfqjzY4JrpIJ8EWsMfTW6GYauMFQleQTYUZg6sP1sNKVG0gOTzVdJqNW6TJpg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4849:: with SMTP id n9mr92168795wrs.139.1561481247941; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:908:1a7:1200:d03b:2ede:e3bb:42c0? ([2a02:908:1a7:1200:d03b:2ede:e3bb:42c0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t14sm11627566wrr.33.2019.06.25.09.47.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=B6rn_Franke?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:47:26 +0200 Subject: Re: Encrypting Solr Index Message-Id: <4C087944-CB39-486E-8422-C27A51B70C79@gmail.com> References: In-Reply-To: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203) Why does FS encryption does not serve your use case? Can=E2=80=99t you apply it also for backups etc? > Am 25.06.2019 um 17:32 schrieb Ahuja, Sakshi : >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I am using solr 6.6 and want to encrypt index for security reasons. I have= tried Windows FS encryption option that works but want to know if solr has s= ome inbuilt feature to encrypt index or any good way to encrypt solr index? >=20 > Thanks, > Sakshi