lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Egense <thomas.ege...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: sample_techproducts tutorial (8.1 guide) has wrong collectioname?
Date Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:18:10 GMT
Thank you,
 I will fix the image to have the correct collection name. It was confusing
showing a different collection image overview
that the one you see when following the tutorial.
/Thomas

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:45 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafalov@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Actually, the tutorial does say "Here’s the first place where we’ll
> deviate from the default options....." and the result name should be
> techproducts.
>
> It is the image that is no longer correct and needs to be updated. And
> perhaps the text should be made clearer.
>
> A pull request with updated image (and matching JIRA) would be most
> welcome. As would any comments on the tutorial sequence in general, as
> we haven't touched it for quite a while. In fact, if somebody wanted
> to flash out the whole tutorial sequence to be more in line with the
> recent Solr features.....
>
> Regards,
>    Alex.
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 07:42, Thomas Egense <thomas.egense@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Solr 8.1 tutorial:
> > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/solr-tutorial.html
> >
> > Following the guide to where you have created the collection and checking
> > the
> > admin page, you get the same picture as shown in
> > "Figure 1. SolrCloud Diagram"
> > (collectionname = gettingstarted) <---
> >
> > Next step is indexing the tech-products samples:
> > solr-8.1.0:$ bin/post -c techproducts example/exampledocs/*
> >
> > But this fails, since the collectionname is "gettingstarted"
> >
> > Instead you have to index with
> > bin/post -c gettingstarted example/exampledocs/*
> >
> > In earlier tutorials the collection name  was indeed "techproducts", so
> it
> > is
> > the collection name that has changed.
> >
> > It is just me doing something wrong? It is hard to believe a such obvious
> > error
> > has not been corrected yet? It seems the 7.1 tutorial has the same error.
> >
> > /Thomas Egense
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message