lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Heisey <>
Subject Re: Atomic updates and stored CopyTo destination fields
Date Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:11:15 GMT
On 11/14/2018 10:35 AM, Jon Kjær Amundsen wrote:
> It is not that I want it.
> I just can't reproduce it even though I read it as an expected behaviour.
> So I wondered if something has been changed since the warning was written,
> or if I had misunderstood something.

To my knowledge, nothing has changed in this area.

If a copyField destination is stored, then I think most people would be 
unhappy with the results of running an atomic update, especially if 
fields related to that copyField are changed with the update.


View raw message