From solr-user-return-143445-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Mon Sep 3 12:23:10 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C9FB180647 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:23:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 98759 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2018 10:23:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98748 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2018 10:23:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 10:23:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9A29D180943 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:23:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-EL4st_aX8Q for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from unibi-smtp-a.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de (unibi-smtp-a.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de [129.70.208.12]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 280B65F174 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:23:05 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from [129.70.11.68] ([129.70.11.68]) by unibi-smtp-a.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.37.0 64bit (built Jan 25 2016)) with ESMTPPA id <0PEH00HVS669G0A0@unibi-smtp-a.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de> for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:22:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Connecting-IP: [129.70.11.68] X-PMX-Version: 6.4.5.2775670, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2018.9.3.101216, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.52.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2018.9.3.5520001, pmx11 X-EnvFrom: bernd.fehling@uni-bielefeld.de Subject: Re: Multiple solr instances per host vs Multiple cores in same solr instance To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org References: <28433_1535266857_w7Q70tWn019639_CAL1=wh0ZOjpuHF0aARrtSiz2G2EPvf6nTn3kRzbu=4ukBHRqaQ@mail.gmail.com> <73468002-daca-60e2-9e93-e21ab782207f@uni-bielefeld.de> <15133_1535402736_w7RKjY4N027218_CAL1=wh3XUbhrrYQ4h_59EY7aODVJxn+ek5JKX5b4aYTs9C_yYA@mail.gmail.com> <393d9f4c-5b54-6add-7d9f-289382b487f3@uni-bielefeld.de> <12896_1535967237_w839Xujn025997_62991608e46061ec0be525c53ea16533bafbec4a.camel@kb.dk> From: Bernd Fehling Message-id: <8aa42d84-c6f9-3ba8-ddde-c37ad49a4b99@uni-bielefeld.de> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:22:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 In-reply-to: <12896_1535967237_w839Xujn025997_62991608e46061ec0be525c53ea16533bafbec4a.camel@kb.dk> Content-language: de-DE Yes thats right, there is no "best" setup at all, only one that gives most advantage to your requirements. And any setup has some disadvantages. Currently I'm short in time and have to bring our Cloud to production but a write-up is in the queue as already done with other developments. https://www.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/~befehl/base/solr/index.html Regards Bernd Am 03.09.2018 um 11:33 schrieb Toke Eskildsen: > On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bernd Fehling wrote: >> Yes, I tested many cases. > > Erick is absolutely right about the challenge of finding "best" setups. > What we can do is gather observations, as you have done, and hope that > people with similar use cases finds them. With that in mind, have you > considered posting a write-up of your hard work somewhere? It seems a > shame only to have is as an input on this mailing list. > > - Toke Eskildsen, Royal Danish Library >