From solr-user-return-142165-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Thu Jun 28 16:11:08 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20194180662 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:11:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 65783 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2018 14:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 65771 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2018 14:11:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:11:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 75E681A058A for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:11:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elyograg.org Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0z5NoXgZCUC5 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frodo.elyograg.org (frodo.elyograg.org [166.70.79.217]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7CD535F300 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frodo.elyograg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FF06B2 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:11:00 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elyograg.org; h= content-language:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:subject:subject:received :received; s=mail; t=1530195059; bh=mDviN9jJDYBI8MyPoquTxzMZGswe ZFjkKBPI1bKBTAo=; b=j+wPVKi5xRcxn7o+NNnxcqUxVamZUSYO0L2AceTJKXxN NG/4SbBTw6ODkXV8Qw217r9/p4VCFbjEzw6O7rRhzd7i++h3hYU/C/dkr66b4WN2 yfLBR54Zkzep9e9qc3CWE8LtfOi4rXi6bccUkAlJiRI7deVFAEEx8vXqg52edao= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frodo.elyograg.org Received: from frodo.elyograg.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frodo.elyograg.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id LVzUPPnWAOPT for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:10:59 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.2.0.108] (client175.mainstreamdata.com [209.63.42.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elyograg@elyograg.org) by frodo.elyograg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92C3E328 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:10:57 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: Indexing Approach To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org References: <1529993213927-0.post@n3.nabble.com> <5a30214b-3ba5-a696-f6ac-4e299effa85e@elyograg.org> <1530023088692-0.post@n3.nabble.com> <1530154752757-0.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Shawn Heisey Message-ID: <8661f689-4717-a23c-a908-0618f88fc661@elyograg.org> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:10:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1530154752757-0.post@n3.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US On 6/27/2018 8:59 PM, solrnoobie wrote: > One last thing though, will a queue based system work for us? Or are there > better suitable implementations? Exactly how you write your indexing software is up to you.  There is no single approach that's the best.  Examine your business needs and the things that the person who must write the program is comfortable using.  Pick an approach that fits those. Thanks, Shawn