From solr-user-return-139729-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org Mon Mar 12 12:17:38 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 484B418064D for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:17:38 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 17973 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2018 11:17:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 17945 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2018 11:17:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:17:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0DDD91828FF for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:17:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dG2U9Ej02Hkc for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl0-f50.google.com (mail-pl0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E6D155F1ED for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl0-f50.google.com with SMTP id w12-v6so9129721plp.4 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:17:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mjd34Qu/tpniZPtbXL7LnBhu/xNX051XNU+2kaChUI8=; b=P5Zu37TNHiu3jMClxAh9NuXOJCgEh0D7/fzSkCheGPa+uz/JkokVrrTltyL8o8weqM 2Bs18TS79QEepf1x6lafEgRqIMlstOAO2A+K/F4GkvtPC5L3Ql8Ly4dgyfOPmehlS7Yf EURYWNNM0Ns3c1pGWCm5y7eJ+9UTv8FI6XVl/UfEJeBLNcpos+r87Q8upizZO3mkTH4y cesoAW269cFV7QKifuw6WIg9zGqyI+RKBQt+XQ7xNAf0OlOsoJ9CqNSILsMH8DYq4iIF xgW0pdIySbuTSwtT4XYzii3v2Lc0ynSBNeExeE3IzUyQEL1K5A7/GXiQEbUoN3IovHgu V7OQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mjd34Qu/tpniZPtbXL7LnBhu/xNX051XNU+2kaChUI8=; b=LvG6dSocgVggH0SjfP6DBW5pk6pABWi9/aOLPBKwpMWQLLHwSachy6dPUXaxVzw2to /ha62EIB8DCs6qhzRdhGm1zWlxqk3LC8uONfAIZGDMq9z6JRP1UaJIdOWw57k0oM5elt N9KUOgB48pE68ReV9JtOTrFSseo4b+mM0XdzTm1upzZYq/tU0rSZZxBaPYCeR7Ko96+m nJJd13f8FRKh6QBJJ3sjaOSfaAxQ6xe0+/4Vna5hTqS/yzQi/NJneOzVLgeJ3j4HycoR dsLefULTTZW+0nNP/sKBSn8er6n+faXmj8cSKWTVxRg+EqvXPMYct9UTp+eSOgH3PgVe a7cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EQf4yXT4iN8NGAv3TjqO5TLJX/BV5FW2Duf7pygyd+KsQGhBAH fkQrfLh5U85xiaGgXHjGJGOTVWHL6a3VZmZ/Tw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtbE8gCOpjD3neVMD25bhIy68z/R6LEtis3bCxestn1byOZfn4Tx/lSJIzSiUmHFiG9zwQWbPI72oklbCkbgwQ= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b83:: with SMTP id p3-v6mr7898422plk.25.1520853444835; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:17:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.174.4 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.174.4 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 04:17:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Deepak Goel Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:47:24 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some performance questions.... To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055bf970567354960" --00000000000055bf970567354960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Now you are mixing your original question about performance with reliability On 12 Mar 2018 02:29, "BlackIce" wrote: > Second to this wouldn't 4 Solr instances each with its own HD be fault > tolerant? vs. one solr instance with 4 HD's in RAID 0? Plus to his comes > the storage capacity, I need the capacity of those 4 drives... the more I > read.. the more questions.... > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 9:43 PM, BlackIce wrote: > > > Thnx for the pointers. > > > > I haven't given much thought to Solr, asides shemal.xml and > solrconfig.xml > > and I'm just diving into a bit more deeper stuff! > > > > Greetz > > > > RRK > > > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Deepak Goel wrote: > > > >> To rephrase your Question > >> > >> "Does Solr do well with Scale-up or Scale-out?" > >> > >> Are there any Performance Benchmarks for the same out there supporting > the > >> claim? > >> > >> On 11 Mar 2018 23:05, "BlackIce" wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I have some questions regarding performance. > >> > > >> > Lets says I have a dual CPU with a total of 8 cores and 24 GB RAM for > my > >> > Solr and some other stuff. > >> > > >> > Would it be more beneficial to only run 1 instance of Solr with the > >> > collection stored on 4 HD's in RAID 0?? Or.... Have several Virtual > >> > Machines each running of its own HD, ie: Have 4 VM's running Solr? > >> > > >> > Any Thoughts? > >> > > >> > Thank you! > >> > > >> > RRK > >> > > >> > > > > > --00000000000055bf970567354960--