Return-Path: <solr-user-return-136732-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@lucene.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183])
	by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9227A200D2B
	for <archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io>; Thu,  2 Nov 2017 15:36:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix)
	id 90BE4160BDE; Thu,  2 Nov 2017 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D506E1609EE
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Thu,  2 Nov 2017 15:36:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 66153 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2017 14:36:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:solr-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <solr-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: moderator for solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 52644 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2017 12:25:48 -0000
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.4
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	HTML_MESSAGE=2, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thecommercepartnership.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=thecommercepartnership.com; s=google;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=M5Kz1sAIYN/pfGV0dsbIV030pPEnghD5CBHt4lFtGCw=;
        b=aZ02T9p4gYqNNwX/t/HRS4J+fwAH0CA3BZ55tYp2qHcB8kMU4f/PffdrykP4QYo0xE
         ysisa/ii3SYPjQzXgRaQq9YPkl/D+j2aAXxZUpjJqSXGOyoHc8zw3ByBakrvA51CPdND
         vcqrnZWri2TSvFZuLNukgcOHd9JRxPTdp846Y=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=M5Kz1sAIYN/pfGV0dsbIV030pPEnghD5CBHt4lFtGCw=;
        b=SLdVDMFmqeEW7wwiIQImoKfyI6mkjlLrJJ8SaFQxEfbayHVHNP3HN6Ed26Kkzj9mJT
         vCpUFsPLwTVrfPlWVU560ZmZ9JSd/kuU2mzkonbsQ5uQ2gKJHEaylOQzRVWpqSEea9r6
         jUureE00lvwyfUQjtCKyhicmKssEgZYaovt2yFDJ7FNcyuLNlR02csZv+hc1HoVAfvTp
         S8hzzJ9zm7TKylBgvv0j70Hb7eDwB4566v9gZG/4nRFDLy5Wvytzc24UFTcLGLIjeAVP
         XTqXC9YoWg8FVEneUdAeUiG1AGdNe3oOe/4a1yoPc96+HYmPJKMDXj3hwNugbGFlVg8p
         V8Ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6YgVETA9cRhE4wkbhgRM1Xg3dTYe9BmnUNJwBsnMFXroRyGN2J
	lCDhA/H9NTS4aWFx3A1c7CUQh7CaK85YbUREb/Fb8iVy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Q9nGzur/uIPVkxGPpEi20pi0ztcjXDFJeTkBvK6kFj+NvIvkH/fYhpvnql/2nf+XTIel6+/aWlXqWQWjmgve0=
X-Received: by 10.107.12.141 with SMTP id 13mr4363323iom.1.1509625543471; Thu,
 02 Nov 2017 05:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Amar Raja <amar.raja@thecommercepartnership.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 12:25:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CAERx9KVpdS-qCOZNSZjRmfXTkrYQPqEZjCd6Apf38hyeEn=nGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: SynonymGraphFilterFactory with edismax
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f9656434db5055cff16d7"
archived-at: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 14:36:41 -0000

--001a113f9656434db5055cff16d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

I have the following field definition:

<fieldType name="text_en" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
  <analyzer type="query">
    <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
    <filter class="solr.SynonymGraphFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt"
ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
    <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true"
words="lang/stopwords_en.txt" />
    <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
    <filter class="solr.EnglishPossessiveFilterFactory"/>
    <filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory"
protected="protwords.txt"/>
    <filter class="solr.PorterStemFilterFactory"/>
  </analyzer>
</fieldType>

And the following two synonym definitions:

kids => boys,girls
metallic => rose gold,metallic

The intent being a user searching for "kids" should get girls or boys
results, but searching for "boys" will not bring back girls results.
Similarly searching for "metallic" should bring back results for either
"metallic" or "rose gold", but the search for "rose gold" should not bring
back "metallic".

Another property I have set is q.op=AND. I.e. "boys tops" should return
where only both terms exist.

The first synonym works well, producing the following dismax query:

(+(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((Synonym(web_name:boi web_name:girl))~1.0)))/no_
coord

However, for the second I get this:

(+(+DisjunctionMaxQuery(((((+web_name:rose +web_name:gold)
web_name:metal)~2))~1.0)))/no_coord

But for any terms where any of the terms in the RHS have multiple terms, it
seems to want to match both synonyms, so in this case only documents with
both "metallic" and "rose gold" will match.

Any ideas where I am going wrong?

--001a113f9656434db5055cff16d7--