lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sundeep T <sundeep....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Possible memory leak with VersionBucket objects
Date Mon, 25 Sep 2017 20:58:09 GMT
Sorry, I meant we are "not" running Solr in cloud mode

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Sundeep T <sundeep.t16@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, but that issue seems specific to SolrCloud like I mentioned. We are
> running Solr in cloud mode and don't have Zookeeper configured
>
> Thanks
> Sundeep
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Steve Rowe <sarowe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sundeep,
>>
>> This looks to me like <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9803>
>> / <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10506>, which was fixed in
>> Solr 7.0.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>> > On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Sundeep T <sundeep.t16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We are running our solr 6.4.2 instance on a single node without
>> zookeeper. So, we are not using solr cloud. We have been ingesting about
>> 50k messages per second into this instance spread over 4 cores.
>> >
>> > When we looked at the heapdump we see that it has there are around 385
>> million instances of VersionBucket objects taking about 8gb memory. This
>> number seems to grow based on the number of cores into which we are
>> ingesting data into.PFA a screen cap of heap recording.
>> >
>> > Browsing through the jira list we saw a similar issue -
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9803
>> >
>> > This issue is recently resolved by Erick. But this issue seems be
>> specifically tied to SolrCloud mode and Zookeeper. We are not using any of
>> these.
>> >
>> > So, we are thinking this could be another issue. Any one has ideas on
>> what this could be and if there is a fix for it?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Sundeep
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message