Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2E0200CE9 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 04:56:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3A9E116E816; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E4F316E80A for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 04:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 92505 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2017 02:56:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 92493 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2017 02:56:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 02:56:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 94787C2E43 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:56:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.401 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAau0kVpSaFB for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:56:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D4E745FDAB for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c74so11628360iod.4 for ; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:56:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9GPPlYLsLaqEXllXjW0ZufUYDVw2fDNJHxxxWyfCiFY=; b=SMC+nos8K0MZyMl6HcPiwwwUrv9AaY/Z9tzdzQKp8+5GuF+85TXryTSXORIc+qpb7n 5ETDV8uKDOw7/aEwXvLc8HbwJUV0Xd4e55Ix/IviG1YwKw4mg/Xho9prnaKtH9RdWLzV 277LBnrVawmHrKNT8H/JoKSLdX40pafABV0NRE7OyCw+mARmgliYJNDDHPn6UHKjhUJk pknMlLu6vqoTOt0Dk80FQNPYmxJBwos07ODBpCjc53KNDI2E+Wb9y+ehN4W/m5csIHAf YwwubrFNJ5LXwMR+n5G5JInq6Wwt3wJemnG30wI9i+nN1Xw0CN9bRdO+WxmMvVUWuhmv z3Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9GPPlYLsLaqEXllXjW0ZufUYDVw2fDNJHxxxWyfCiFY=; b=rkXNjSljvAhMg7U3RLK7oYlhRa7A2UBk6zybBgswMyRsn9abn2FtD/dLAq9ySZ9vUW Cf6kx/LZZKPlaeUqkjJxQq9gA8Dq5TuSQ0ck1LfbcOctHcDHiUktJQWIVH51+jEoNyMj F89wU/Hn4eQT6pF+QP8IJCh76I0NeQrxaiEcfM2kL+z+J6DUL9wbnMG3K9o8EwX3luaZ 24Yy49d0qG8XFIobrkf3H99tolUWqT52Q9ls27+KXA61FjWM71ZiyDdR8vFJfyASju96 Y2aZ0HXIb3pj3/UTgO/LVJA+ErP2ppAKulpmMJpNJ7V3ziFN6JjHCCqKjhtZl1GQGHuM zLCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110t+f2XHvBmYqqHkEGFiM2I3o8qQ/ye2JfplGdEz5iHCE/QfI3w dN1p53P+Foy3CsiFOBI= X-Received: by 10.107.164.199 with SMTP id d68mr4581105ioj.85.1501901773564; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.107] (cpe-69-204-22-28.buffalo.res.rr.com. [69.204.22.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 201sm1439108iof.21.2017.08.04.19.56.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 19:56:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 22:56:12 -0400 Subject: Re: MongoDb vs Solr Message-Id: <1766135A-8EB7-41F8-8784-1C5647508B76@gmail.com> References: <733EC8E9-4C46-4BA0-A57E-EC4B4E94656F@wunderwood.org> In-Reply-To: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14C92) archived-at: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 02:56:20 -0000 Uhm. Dude are you drinking? 1. Lucidworks would never say that.=20 2. Maria is not a json +MySQL. Maria is a fork of the last open source versi= on of MySQL before oracle bought them=20 3.walter is 100% correct. Solr is search. The only complex data structure it= has is an array. Something like mongo can do arrays hashes arrays of hashes= etc, it's actually json based. But it can't search well as a search engine c= an.=20 There is no one tool. Use each for their own abilities.=20 > On Aug 4, 2017, at 10:35 PM, GW wrote: >=20 > The people @ Lucidworks would beg to disagree but I know exactly what you > are saying Walter. >=20 > A simple flat file like a cardx is fine and dandy as a Solrcloud noSQL DB.= > I like to express it as knowing when to fish and when to cut bait. As soon= > as you are in the one - many or many - many world a real DB is a whole lot= > more sensible. >=20 > Augment your one-many|many-many NoSQL DB with a Solrcloud and you've got a= > rocket. Maria (MySQL with JSON) has had text search for a long time but It= > just does not compare to Solr. Put the two together and you've got some > serious magic. >=20 > No offense intended, There's nothing wrong with being 97.5% correct. I wis= h > I could be 97.5% correct all the time. :-) >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 4 August 2017 at 18:41, Walter Underwood wrote= : >>=20 >> Solr is NOT a database. If you need a database, don=E2=80=99t choose Solr= . >>=20 >> If you need both a database and search, choose MarkLogic. >>=20 >> wunder >> Walter Underwood >> wunder@wunderwood.org >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Aug 4, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Francesco Viscomi >> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi all, >>> why i have to choose solr if mongoDb is easier to learn and to use? >>> Both are NoSql database, is there a good reason to chose solr and not >>> mongoDb? >>>=20 >>> thanks really much >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Ing. Viscomi Francesco >>=20 >>=20