lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amrit Sarkar <sarkaramr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CloudSolrClient preferred over LBHttpSolrClient
Date Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:15:52 GMT
S G,

Not sure about the documentation but:

The CloudSolrClient uses a connection to zookeeper to extract cluster
information like who is a the leader for a shard in a solr collection. To
create a CloudSolrClient all you specify is the zookeepers and which
collection you want to work with. Behind the scenes solrj will load balance
and send the request to the right "shard" in the cluster. The
CloudSolrClient is better if you have a cluster of multiple solr nodes
across multiple machines.

While in LBHttpSolrClient, load balancing is done using a simple
round-robin on the list of servers.

Hope this helps.

Amrit Sarkar
Search Engineer
Lucidworks, Inc.
415-589-9269
www.lucidworks.com
Twitter http://twitter.com/lucidworks
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarkaramrit2

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:38 PM, S G <sg.online.email@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if CloudSolrClient is preferred over LBHttpSolrClient ?
> If yes, why so and has there been any good performance benefits documented
> anywhere?
>
> Thanks
> SG
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message