lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: solr cloud vs standalone solr
Date Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:21 GMT
There is no solid rule. Honestly stand alone solr can handle quite a bit, I don't think there's
a valid reason to go to cloud unless you are starting from scratch and want to use the newest
buzz word, stand alone can handle well over half a terabyte index at sub second speeds all
day long.  

> On Jul 29, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Aman Tandon <amantandon.10@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Sara,
> 
> There is hard n fast rule, performance depends on caches, RAM, hdd etc.and
> how much resourced you could invest to keep the acceptable performance.
> Information on Number of Indexed documents, number of dynamic fields can be
> viewed from the below link. I hope this helps.
> 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-limitations-td4076250.html
> 
>> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017, 13:23 sara hajili <hajili.sara@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> hi all,
>> I want to know when standalone solr can't be sufficient for storing data
>> and we need to migrate to solr cloud?for example standalone solr take too
>> much time to return query result or to store document or etc.
>> 
>> in other word ,what is best capacity and data index size in  standalone
>> solr  that doesn't bad effect on query running and data inserting
>> performance?and after passing this index size i must switch to solr cloud?
>> 

Mime
View raw message