Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 04:51:54 -0700 (MST)
From: mganeshs <mganeshs@live.in>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Message-ID: <1498564314656-4343005.post@n3.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJuqOKJT1o9L3YaHh56PWkjnnhUq=uK_QGsRYFivajS-FnoXGg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1498230296315-4342563.post@n3.nabble.com> <CAN4YXve+r1H-TMXmJp4++tvN2+Ei-fZ=K=sfA7+zgto3PH6-hA@mail.gmail.com> <1498456007593-4342778.post@n3.nabble.com> <CAJuqOKJT1o9L3YaHh56PWkjnnhUq=uK_QGsRYFivajS-FnoXGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Using of Streaming to join between shards
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:52:00 -0000

Hi Susheel,

Thanks for your reply and as you suggested we will start with innerJoin.

But what I want know is that, Is Streaming can be used instead of normal
default Join ? 

For ex. currently we fire request for every user clicks on menu in the page
to show list of his documents with default JOIN and it works well without
any issues with 100 concurrent users as well or even more than that
concurrency.

Can we do same for streaming join as well ? I just want to know whether
concurrent streaming request will create heavy load to solr server or it's
same as default join. What would be penalty of using streaming concurrently
instead of default join ?

Kindly throw some light on this topic.


--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-of-Streaming-to-join-between-shards-tp4342563p4343005.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.