Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C641200C8B for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 22:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9AF04160BBF; Mon, 22 May 2017 20:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E0C2B160BAD for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 22:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 27003 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2017 20:42:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26991 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2017 20:42:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 May 2017 20:42:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7364FCD2A9 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 20:42:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sial.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrPH9MNWkhsi for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 20:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com (mail-pf0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2482E5F2AB for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 20:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m17so92816365pfg.3 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:41:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sial.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e3sZYvBXReuIvsc7g0XmBuDrsY31zf+ye56k2odh718=; b=snahu6WQ48gOh6ZyO5vix+6PYjSMa0h0muACybNrh0UrxUVabgwgpsOc/2Nd9PRM08 7A0/5owywAWoqImR74Gb+/eLeM0vZvk974gvuHH5CFNzzRgE/M3G4+NKFm+PTRQpt/s7 RM6cKf9EnVoBuX57Ka7kVl3v/QQW5NtBUROSCAc42laXMkvN9iSreGmjzBAY7EpDiZ+v y6nyk+yWnB3ooHFhFdZEHZGz6yW5njrB+295NS/A2CrVqzVB1DjSpGwg1uE5yld0kXTD OM1+Ii4gG8EsZEj+g3WnDB83BPkrhOOyWWMmyWKJAxeLDxOomqT5NcrO8I/gpPUyTc2I dROA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e3sZYvBXReuIvsc7g0XmBuDrsY31zf+ye56k2odh718=; b=eY1Z83x4yr3wLkc6SLLsI8nD4ySUslnoI7zCuzr7MTiZ1du4m2QyXbG25FfLyIisp2 RpCwMtrObc0N2oGrjZpiua/TDjHtAWsHHg6pKs7XJI7hqzQ1oWuFUBLcQfyHb8LPOcuy /L3C4HcuC3De2lTyoVTKiew3ghJDlpCPzmdJeX3CMKjrlo9ajgo77lTXMSAWbx8ohslR 6of9hKQj7AubT90IMyTPH2wX14AkuyrsVFsoVeNhC1rpCN+26UF+7IdnlO8FId3iVPug ZyCN6uQlEno5D63G6RNS4wz2rZLo+3hT5XZIdtMxU4sW6gQM4Rv/cyMAO5zgest5WkPG MHKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAEWCIU5vvFup1n1pB50ZTXH45jdAS074Ob+YCVqPZujpkdFGsk /dKFWoT8WXxCmUfi+Avd4nCiaWBUw6oFSzAf3k0eU6+SPlrVWPlz24dmbJaAjKoyquOx0WBjE4Q OeimtN98/k82DVDilfm3YYKU= X-Received: by 10.99.95.79 with SMTP id t76mr27455352pgb.82.1495485717539; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:41:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.183.194 with HTTP; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:41:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Webster Homer Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:41:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: solrcloud replicas not in sync To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d4d72f62f29055022e6a1" archived-at: Mon, 22 May 2017 20:42:04 -0000 --001a114d4d72f62f29055022e6a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I have a solrcloud collection with 2 shards and 4 replicas. The replicas for shard 1 have different numbers of records, so different queries will return different numbers of records. I am not certain how this occurred, it happened in a collection that was a cdcr target. Is there a way to limit a search to a specific replica of a shard? We want to understand the differences Is there a way to recover when a shard has inconsistent replicas. If I use the delete replica API call to delete one of them and then use add replica to create it from scratch will it auto-populate from the other replica in the shard? Thanks, Webster -- This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith. Click http://www.emdgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, French, Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer. --001a114d4d72f62f29055022e6a1--