lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>
Subject Re: Solr performance on EC2 linux
Date Tue, 02 May 2017 17:23:56 GMT
Hmm, has anyone measured the overhead of timeAllowed? We use it all the time.

If nobody has, I’ll run a benchmark with and without it.

wunder
Walter Underwood
wunder@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)


> On May 2, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> : I specify a timeout on all queries, ....
> 
> Ah -- ok, yeah -- you mean using "timeAllowed" correct?
> 
> If the root issue you were seeing is in fact clocksource related,
> then using timeAllowed would probably be a significant compounding 
> factor there since it would involve a lot of time checks in a single 
> request (even w/o any debugging enabled)
> 
> (did your coworker's experiements with ES use any sort of equivilent 
> timeout feature?)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message