lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetić <otis.gospodne...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Poll: Master-Slave or SolrCloud?
Date Tue, 25 Apr 2017 02:29:35 GMT
Hi,

I think it's roughly the same profile of people.  The poll from 2013 was on
Sematext blog and the new one is on Sematext Twitter account.  But it
doesn't really matter so much whether people are the same or not.  What
amazes me that in 2017 we don't see a lot more SolrCloud users!

Otis
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/


On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yeah, this is kind of counter to my expectations too. I guess my
> question is whether the same people are responding to the new survey
> as the old one. "If it ain't broke" and all that.
>
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Otis Gospodnetić
> <otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm really really surprised here.  Back in 2013 we did a poll to see how
> > people were running Master-Slave (4.x back then) and SolrCloud was a bit
> > more popular than Master-Slave:
> > https://sematext.com/blog/2013/02/25/poll-solr-cloud-or-not/
> >
> > Here is a fresh new poll with pretty much the same question - How do you
> > run your Solr? <https://twitter.com/sematext/status/854927627748036608>
> -
> > and guess what?  SolrCloud is *not* at all a lot more prevalent than
> > Master-Slave.
> >
> > We definitely see a lot more SolrCloud used by Sematext Solr
> > consulting/support customers, so I'm a bit surprised by the results of
> this
> > poll so far.
> >
> > Is anyone else surprised by this?  See https://twitter.com/sematext/
> > status/854927627748036608
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Otis
> > --
> > Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message