lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Get handler not working
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:12:00 GMT
Does real time get implementation reroutes the request internally to a
different shard? If not, then maybe the request is going to a
non-primary shard.

Regards,
   Alex.
----
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced


On 16 March 2017 at 09:33, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> Something to do with routing perhaps? (the mapping of ids to shards,
> by default is based on hashes of the id)
> -Yonik
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote:
>> iqdocid is already set to be the uniqueKey value.
>>
>> I tried reindexing a few documents back into the problematic cloud and am
>> getting the same behavior of no document found for get handler.
>>
>> I've also done some testing on standalone instances as well as some quick
>> cloud setups (with embedded zk), and I cannot seem to replicate the
>> problem. For each test, I used the exact same configset that is causing the
>> issue for us and indexed a document from that instance as well. I can
>> provide more details if that would be useful in anyway.
>>
>> Standalone instance worked
>> Cloud mode worked regardless of the use of the security plugin
>> Cloud mode worked regardless of explicit get handler definition
>> Cloud mode consistently worked with explicitly defining the get handler,
>> then removing it and reloading the collection
>>
>> The only differences that I know of between the tests and the problematic
>> cloud is that solr is running as a different user and using an external
>> zookeeper ensemble. The running user has ownership of the solr
>> installation, log, and data directories.
>>
>> I'm going to keep trying different setups to see if I can replicate the
>> issue, but if anyone has any ideas on what direction might make the most
>> sense, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:49 PM Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Wait... Is iqdocid set to the <uniqueKey> in your schema? That might
>> be the missing thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote:
>>> Unless the behavior's changed on the way to version 6.3.0, the get handler
>>> used to use whatever field is set to be the uniqueKey. We have
>> successfully
>>> been using get on a 4.9.0 standalone core with no explicit "id" field
>>> defined by passing in the value for the uniqueKey field to the get
>> handler.
>>> We tend to have a bunch of id fields floating around from different
>>> sources, so we avoid keeping any of them named as "id"
>>>
>>> iqdocid is just a basic string type
>>> <field name="iqdocid" type="string" multiValued="false" indexed="true"
>>> required="true" stored="true"/>
>>>
>>> I'll do some more testing on standalone versions, and see how that goes.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM David Hastings <
>> hastings.recursive@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> from your previous email:
>>>> "There is no "id"
>>>> field defined in the schema."
>>>>
>>>> you need an id field to use the get handler
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I thought that "id" and "ids" were fixed parameters for the get
>> handler,
>>>> > but I never remember, so I've already tried both. Each time it comes
>> back
>>>> > with the same response of no document.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:31 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch <
>>>> arafalov@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Actually.....
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I think Real Time Get handler has "id" as a magical parameter,
not as
>>>> > > a field name. It maps to the real id field via the uniqueKey
>>>> > > definition:
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/RealTime+Get
>>>> > >
>>>> > > So, if you have not, could you try the way you originally wrote
it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Regards,
>>>> > >    Alex.
>>>> > > ----
>>>> > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and
>>>> > experienced
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 15 March 2017 at 13:22, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media>
wrote:
>>>> > > > Sorry, that is a typo. The get is using the iqdocid field.
There is
>>>> no
>>>> > > "id"
>>>> > > > field defined in the schema.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > solr/TestCollection/get?iqdocid=2957-TV-201604141900
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM Erick Erickson <
>>>> > erickerickson@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >> Is this a typo or are you trying to use get with an "id"
field and
>>>> > > >> your filter query uses "iqdocid"?
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> Best,
>>>> > > >> Erick
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > > >> > Yes, we're using a fixed schema with the iqdocid
field set as
>> the
>>>> > > >> uniqueKey.
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:28 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch
<
>>>> > > >> arafalov@gmail.com>
>>>> > > >> > wrote:
>>>> > > >> >
>>>> > > >> >> What is your uniqueKey? Is it iqdocid?
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> Regards,
>>>> > > >> >>    Alex.
>>>> > > >> >> ----
>>>> > > >> >> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr
users, new and
>>>> > > >> experienced
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >> >> On 15 March 2017 at 11:24, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > >> >> > Hi,
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> > I've been trying to use the get handler
for a new solr cloud
>>>> > > >> collection
>>>> > > >> >> we
>>>> > > >> >> > are using, and something seems to be amiss.
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> > We are running 6.3.0, so we did not explicitly
define the
>>>> request
>>>> > > >> handler
>>>> > > >> >> > in the solrconfig since it's supposed to
be implicitly
>> defined.
>>>> > We
>>>> > > >> also
>>>> > > >> >> > have the update log enabled with the default
configuration.
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> > Whenever I send a get query for a document
already known to
>> be
>>>> in
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > >> >> > collection, I get no documents returned.
But when I use a
>>>> filter
>>>> > > >> query on
>>>> > > >> >> > the uniqueKey field for the same value I
get the document
>> back
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> > solr/TestCollection/get?id=2957-TV-201604141900
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> > Is there some configuration that I am missing?
>>>> > > >> >> >
>>>> > > >> >> > Thanks,
>>>> > > >> >> > Chris
>>>> > > >> >>
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>

Mime
View raw message