Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAD8200C17 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:55:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0920B160B5C; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 51D79160B4E for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:55:40 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 21775 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2017 21:55:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21763 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2017 21:55:38 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:55:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E65A21A0571 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:55:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MI7xZ-EJ3QT7 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f179.google.com (mail-ot0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D12EE5F1B3 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 73so38661336otj.0 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:55:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5LZhwtUr+PcVnUjX7/+sdwVdK8EffVGvfGdQDTUWf5A=; b=ofFSoURc1SctpHHTGFPorkU2a5ghiYjd5sbiTjhzOspteN5lweVk92lfvcDk6F4mX/ nvV6SD1imWUqklAHZwg6K2LEENljLZ2HLOgKfrEcwEgYX3dJTc59ebyaWp49BpPu+mQ6 7lqf2k0FVgxjyhkKukgrSNWLDcs+GTfUd7C8eFHwvVQBGES3+xVJ+Yxiu5xZi8vg+C0a yCYnOUGJE1fDskfGIjF0J4jQ0ijeeWmSZ/c76vHgDIYHoJCiDEGZpWK/VvPEQ8V2cuN5 Y2aJCnoRaKSV2ajz5y2/WG19IXdrXU7feYu9+fp88BfGJloLM3YH7KIMe+x/83wmGLHi 6f1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5LZhwtUr+PcVnUjX7/+sdwVdK8EffVGvfGdQDTUWf5A=; b=CtDkDZvCOhj8wDhrWe8vCkkYIjkIrkXd1A2c1lrRlQj7V/6XL1v4fma4QL6yCE6+Dq mbtkyXVRkYYfQJ0FKFanXMgCGNKUjnbEU0QtPX3MvwKThTqe3l/VEQS7E/yHY5Jc3qi2 Fy7NMcxWggDX5ZzgZ6Fr6PIJmVBnDoUe47DQzRneb86MlY2tDVXOkgIyElbb/Hdag9la cYEQ4f5nnNAWskHlB5iQNBiAgHt8i+STX36sxBd+nVSZDNANRNk6m5TOvmoezkJBB1L3 0C6luelji5vCrPTFX9BkrdeUdDNN6HMgBzu+MBCdfjPxThjr+771tjysvDX1xOIkAk9M FyRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nk/ZjMrBD8gE0ptcUf7nN9jflIi0814AzQAg9kn/lwkDegtBmsYzAvj4YZOuYpCBR8nbAr/bsn3xx49g== X-Received: by 10.157.19.43 with SMTP id f40mr6597931ote.189.1486763730113; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:55:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.241.134 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:55:29 -0800 (PST) From: David Hastings Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:55:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: commongrams To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113deb90ff99bd0548342722 archived-at: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:55:41 -0000 --001a113deb90ff99bd0548342722 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hey All, I followed an old blog post about implementing the common grams, and used the 400 most popular words file on a subset of my data. original index size was 33gb with 2.2 million documents, using the 400, it grep to 96gb. I scaled it down to the 100 most common words and got to about 76gb, but with a cold phrase search going from 4 seconds at 400 words to 6 with 100. this will not really scale well, as the base index that this is a subset of right now has 22 million documents and sits around 360 gb. at this rate, it would be around a TB index size. is there a common hardware/software configuration to handle TB size indexes? thanks, DH --001a113deb90ff99bd0548342722--