Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BE4200C1B for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:13:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 28657160B5F; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EAC2160B52 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:13:38 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 91534 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2017 11:13:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91522 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2017 11:13:36 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:13:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 35F9B18819C for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:13:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.319 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.319 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6sK6dyiqdFn for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi (smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi [128.214.173.75]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 49AA85F1B3 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kkv11009.lib.helsinki.fi (kkv11009.lib.helsinki.fi [128.214.71.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-rs1.it.helsinki.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1EBDW21021659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:13:32 +0200 Subject: Re: Performance degradation after upgrading from 6.2.1 to 6.4.1 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org References: From: Ere Maijala Message-ID: <1c648d64-a810-45f0-5e36-001de410d136@helsinki.fi> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:13:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:13:39 -0000 It might be . --Ere 14.2.2017, 11.52, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen kirjoitti: > We are seeing performance degradation on our SolrCloud instances after > upgrading to 6.4.1. > > > Here are a couple of graphs. As you can see, 6.4.1 was introduced 2/10 > 1200: > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/qrc0wodain50azz/solr1.png?dl=0 > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/sdk30imm8jlomz2/solr2.png?dl=0 > > > These are two very different usage scenarios: > > > * Solr1 has constant updates and very volatile data (30 minutes TTL, 20 > shards with no replicas, across 8 servers). Requests in the 99 percentile > went from ~400ms to 1000-1500ms. (Hystrix cutoff at 1.5s) > > > * Solr2 is a more traditional instance with long-lived data (updated once a > day, 24 shards with 2 replicas, across 8 servers). Requests in the 99 > percentile went from ~400ms to at least 1s. (Hystrix cutoff at 1s) > > > I've been looking around, but cannot really find a reason for the > performance degradation. Does any of you have an idea? > > > Cheers, > > Henrik > -- Ere Maijala Kansalliskirjasto / The National Library of Finland