lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Davis <johndavis925...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Empty facets on TextField
Date Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:06:52 GMT
We've hit this issue again since solr defaults new fields to string type
which has docvalues. Changing those to be lowercase text does not remove
the docvalues and breaks faceting. Is there a way to remove docvalues for a
field w/o starting fresh?

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, a delete-by-query of *:* may also be hit-or-miss on replicas
> in a solr cloud setup because of reorders.
> If it does work, you should see something in the logs at the INFO
> level like "REMOVING ALL DOCUMENTS FROM INDEX"
>
> -Yonik
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A delete-by-query of *:* may do it (because it special cases to
> > removing the index).
> > The underlying issue is when lucene merges a segment without docvalues
> > with a segment that has them.
> > -Yonik
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:09 PM, John Davis <johndavis925254@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Thanks. Is there a way around to not starting fresh and forcing the
> reindex
> >> to remove docValues?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This sounds like you didn't actually start fresh, but just reindexed
> your
> >>> data.
> >>> This would mean that docValues would still exist in the index for this
> >>> field (just with no values), and that normal faceting would use those.
> >>> Forcing facet.method=enum forces the use of the index instead of
> >>> docvalues (or the fieldcache if the field is configured w/o
> >>> docvalues).
> >>>
> >>> -Yonik
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:43 PM, John Davis <johndavis925254@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > I have converted one of my fields from StrField to TextField and am
> not
> >>> > getting back any facets for that field. Here's the exact
> configuration
> >>> > of
> >>> > the TextField. I have tested it with 6.2.0 on a fresh instance and
it
> >>> > repros consistently. From reading through past archives and
> >>> > documentation,
> >>> > it feels like this should just work. I would appreciate any input.
> >>> >
> >>> > <fieldType name="lowercase" class="solr.TextField" omitNorms="true"
> >>> > omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" indexed="true" stored="true"
> >>> > positionIncrementGap="100" sortMissingLast="true" multiValued="true">
> >>> >     <analyzer>
> >>> >       <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> >>> >       <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >>> >     </analyzer>
> >>> >   </fieldType>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Search
> >>> > query:
> >>> > /select/?facet.field=FACET_FIELD_NAME&facet=on&indent=on&
> q=QUERY_STRING&wt=json
> >>> >
> >>> > Interestingly facets are returned if I change facet.method to enum
> >>> > instead
> >>> > of default fc.
> >>> >
> >>> > John
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message