Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CB2200BF0 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:01:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B65E7160B32; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 13D73160B19 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:01:53 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 30306 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2016 20:01:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 30212 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2016 20:01:51 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4E1E5C0EFD for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.019 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.019 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=1.629, HTML_MESSAGE=2, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qXXfA84J04D7 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com (mail-pg0-f67.google.com [74.125.83.67]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 19F8B5F46F for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id n5so22959225pgh.3 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:01:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:user-agent:message-id:cc:to:from:subject:mime-version; bh=gmMlLj3qWhl1UeJ5NJtAZC3n3oIIQyFglc+WgKf/nD8=; b=kt4pklG6aUcs4CNVLKgsTGm+b1RB2aMxF5OVcMJ4qNJ6syQEv0Y62249kbE6ySykqY fx+080PmDTvD7MquAMXGIuX/zKFUd90z4BbNr9hhR6m0rRr62MCjhj3620Sb9ASP2M/g ZSlXcswdyNT6ODcynGvX39FIXWINeMZh8bdXew1YCrtapRsF6uCEvfY9BNKhx4pyp2Ou O4QiJ6i5BjTfxlpZexmEil4gmSN5wFcldmvEg4bn93w+SUCdKOgCZsguRIWrNsnac+ic acn1gqHfU3HsgbQUQcMdCdKnZdxWEF8d0OTKazu/ntrWmo0rVVEYV85Q69WX73KQZZ69 jFLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:user-agent:message-id:cc:to:from:subject :mime-version; bh=gmMlLj3qWhl1UeJ5NJtAZC3n3oIIQyFglc+WgKf/nD8=; b=lkR6dPvgTs/hwMypADk3o/d7Cwkij+rY6ya6xvNNlfqPs//l1Iem0lwkVhefl0Wi9p UITl4elLud8xoLUi6NTnxDzpar3AE/SRb2WLbVyagRpptDhO/YWWWzMtLoC/OwgdBhDq dOwmaO+x6DRVFJy35Nv4OsWtw0kuIL4HRif21pMV1Yq/Je199RIPp3spzMuFHEOhybfX kILwpYLUxtFLTGLDCybnSlURMIaobDQTLqlZzf7E96nAJXe4whrWgkow5G95TYW13R4d enSgqwqzFsMBNq6oYnQRBwORQ2SRHX9/gIDlk0jkvZpBoLNrug2q/IEmLUKn4Sp/Dugj SJMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIT/vzaUZLgD2C0modl9Q8NtxKCCfI499kgsVdZaMA6ElOkKt6YeJBSBj+P48X8ow== X-Received: by 10.99.159.26 with SMTP id g26mr87733241pge.62.1483128106174; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:01:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ec2-52-32-125-241.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [52.32.125.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l71sm66715789pga.21.2016.12.30.12.01.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:01:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:44 +0000 User-Agent: NylasMailer/0.4 Message-Id: X-Inbox-Id: anll6tk27r3wptjcuarde2ppx-2147483647 Cc: Gary Yue , "wei.shen@ymail.com" , "simplely@gmail.com" To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" From: Jichi Guo Subject: Best practices to debug Solr search in production without all fields stored Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="fd01f1e704714b2ba602de0e3607334a" archived-at: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 20:01:54 -0000 --fd01f1e704714b2ba602de0e3607334a Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 Hi everyone, I found it convenient to debug Solr search results if I mark all fields to be "stored=true" in schema. For example, given a document, I could check why it is not returned in a query with debug=true. But in production, most of the fields have "stored=false" for performance reason. I am wondering what would be the recommended approaches to easily reason Solr search results if some used fields are not stored? Thanks! Sent from [Nylas N1](https://link.nylas.com/link/5tkvmhpozan5j5h3lhni487b/loca l-32350514-1e41/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fnylas.com%2Fn1%3Fref%3Dn1&r=c29sci11c 2VyQGx1Y2VuZS5hcGFjaGUub3Jn), the extensible, open source mail client. ![](https://link.nylas.com/open/5tkvmhpozan5j5h3lhni487b/local-32350514-1e41?r =c29sci11c2VyQGx1Y2VuZS5hcGFjaGUub3Jn) --fd01f1e704714b2ba602de0e3607334a--