Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36639200BD4 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:13:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 34FE2160B10; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F778160B0B for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 02:13:49 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 69133 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2016 01:13:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 69121 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2016 01:13:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 01:13:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 02601C03A4 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:13:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.211 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.211 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V2hAd_N4E4Vh for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com (mail-io0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 919A15F239 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 01:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c21so416655495ioj.1 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qfcy0DuF8bo1ciFZaehQkfa0TUYKoxstE8WWJBu+LfA=; b=O+31MglzmhXykARBMyuaBKPrJWh1hBlqJYqXW5v43Ge2EGtheKQBwMYJP7fOHggLrk Bo1ilQYODjp/XfliGk9n7pG7j38VGlbQzEOQ1rTD3NMxdnBjoYV5wZ0v3a0CXTL76HnA oEykpg6kGvQCjiY6+RzaOdSQdBbWQ9CqgPpqwPpbmSdgMiUv3MChnnrzCmt7aHwSuOXR F0RkLh3GKHkWoAZb7iit4LKeWmvOENTTDttGMLooW1xlZ2ubfktNKgCft/NEekRJkyli TNs2oGK6wNSMuq2h5dDxM6XerXy+gxixBSGFX87Nml54M58lLdKowMlAotSSLC0t0brt E4AA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=qfcy0DuF8bo1ciFZaehQkfa0TUYKoxstE8WWJBu+LfA=; b=ZjmL4ky9NUHFprujAHLbnI8/hLw51p1nTCHjBjh4mTTJoLcuW33a58FfjYDap5aKq3 QWv0sn6KYT6EBC3odELa05Hw/g1xn6PKXhxaQ3HQRuANEtfdvzKqDW3laQ9BaWbtvP1+ MNMTiz3Da1YVc7Qll8phW/cnB/ZyDm3BO4DQF3BRdgHd0aZBlNE5J8BtIKuWtrpCBvvO 9MN9/IFM/oFaqiwvdHfnpjmz82eZ6yi3XHz+S1571KJ6KCV9YV/P57FKWsBeuAxzVFQq M0zrCDREqiZ4rtfRYUlDLiAnXM7RBuJROsoqArFONiNCQ+dvJEihELAKyewAfXbfIhi2 Eymg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01/PrLmPHB7Vq44t48f08PzMSpshKzXua5EENt712Icd888MRQGsXZ4dCgmbIwrv8fiqr02bFt7RIvBzA== X-Received: by 10.36.28.2 with SMTP id c2mr518409itc.105.1480641219634; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:13:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.26.132 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:12:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1480621344392-4308226.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1480621344392-4308226.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Erick Erickson Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:12:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pagination issue To: solr-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 01:13:50 -0000 Are you absolutely and totally sure that the s are unique (id by default) when you say that the only difference is the date? It sounds like you're somehow getting the same doc indexed with two (or more) different IDs. You can look at this by identifying some suspect IDs and issuing queries like solr/collection1_shard1_replica1?q=id:suspect_id&distrib=false against a single replica for each shard. The doc shoule be found on one and only one shard (any replica). It's important that you add &distrib=false and address a specific replica when you do this. Best, Erick On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Halim Chaibi wrote: > Hi, > We are using solr cloud 4.10.4, with 4 shards, one replica for each shard. > The id field definition is a unique composite key id (key_id!document_id) > /> > > We are having an issue with the pagination: > Some documents found with a request, let's says, of 100 documents starting > from 200(rows=100&start=200) > Are still found with the same request with rows=100&start=300. > The only difference with the same document found with the two request is in > the timestamp, it's very slight difference a few ms. > > Please, can you help us to figure out what is happening ? > thank you > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Pagination-issue-tp4308226.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.