Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C02F200B9A for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4A7E5160AE8; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 87D05160AD6 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:05:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 45196 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2016 09:05:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 45184 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2016 09:05:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:05:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 10AF9C7D59 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:05:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.094 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.094 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, URI_HEX=1.313, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cominvent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1kU1bP4vj9V for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7E0FD5F56F for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b81so36047782lfe.1 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cominvent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=wYO8BxmGrwlvNvi3Pnt0a8AAwavG7Wg6Fj7TB+ft6sI=; b=AAi7fkLXFMylHr/1uA4TM0L80Z6N5MVaCp3nuJFq8Uqod0MTQDLi3hiYLdnGy8yZGU eP3LYT8gCZ8VnkZMPuqRoX81drx7NMZku7h6AH1uImEN1ucHRL7bqFL+OoZgoA5Q7wUh pfwpUW65VyiulcvSyXXSbl3VBOCnHjxv49ifQwbrEvluGLSaps1nglpEpj7/TMPfdhk3 ZVHUAy6+UDRlhvZt71/go9CE2/R0i8nnA2PYHp0ShZTESeibaFz6/fIXXntqXp0JasS3 NLy/O5Tmcku64CfyFs9M1aWJptMWy+sasj69v9M05jjYkoBJSjdicUlsdWjZ8tdo2hW/ pXYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=wYO8BxmGrwlvNvi3Pnt0a8AAwavG7Wg6Fj7TB+ft6sI=; b=M7EgU0CTvpBcd9vf4oyM1d4ecFLvsf8g5Auy0PDLFlwtX19i9WyXj3pUcjTbJk2aD/ 75/dbyS6uxwJG6cVWCVDs/4jLdGzw/JqE83OuP8bSun2b+idyAfsgrkVC0EsRcOjtJXk XekE4MhzCQiMGmZpMWQ6BDB6KOPkGbhNusVmK6U0DfktiZPxJcNd8AATBR0inpRWPWl0 +1/nggMF6UvZUUXWSUpI882HoUu17NYiyBnm1fT3jooT6sNXQOqR2pRfLBkQNkaNoO8X pAmkWYA9eftwrFqb9EmjnB6OF/jQs4LAaH1lUDNEQ9U5LFhT08QA7HGPmuKsMPjZQhaw EqYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlwz75sQKK3WjqFIX7B9vr5hsxj9J1Hy4xEnxPTN76894dYuXlPWRFODK9znvROyg== X-Received: by 10.25.92.152 with SMTP id u24mr7370390lfi.114.1475831143862; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.127.63] ([195.159.250.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 125sm3469828ljj.8.2016.10.07.02.05.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Oct 2016 02:05:43 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Jan_H=C3=B8ydahl?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3BA3A8C1-8435-45EA-9103-7272F014759C" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3246\)) Subject: Re: solr 5 leaving tomcat, will I be the only one fearing about this? Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:05:40 +0200 References: <1475791345069-4300065.post@n3.nabble.com> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <7E31855D-003E-4B53-8577-9BC8F7ADFEDF@cominvent.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3246) archived-at: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 09:05:56 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_3BA3A8C1-8435-45EA-9103-7272F014759C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 To give an exanmple: While you earlier would do some thing like Download and install Tomcat (or some other servlet container) Setup Tomcat as a service Download and unpack Solr Create a SOLR_HOME folder with correct content copy solr.war into tomcat/webapps set CATALINA_OPTS=3D=E2=80=9C-Dsolr.solr.home=3D/path/to/home = -Dsolr.x.y=3Dz=E2=80=A6. GC-flags etc=E2=80=9D Setup Tomcat as a service service tomcat start You would with 6.x do: Download Solr and unpack the install-script solr/bin/install_solr_service solr-6.2.0.tgz # Install Tune /etc/default/solr.in.sh to your likings (mem, port, solr-home, Zk = etc) service solr start (or bin/solr start [options]) Your client would talk to Solr on typically http://host.name:8983/solr/ = as a standalone server, not as one out of many webapps on 8080. -- Jan H=C3=B8ydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 7. okt. 2016 kl. 02.32 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch = : >=20 > Treat Solr as a blackbox standalone database. Your MySQL is running > standalone, right? >=20 > And try to go to Solr 6, if you can. 5 is not latest anymore and there = had > been lots of scaling improvements in 6. >=20 > Regards, > Alex >=20 > On 7 Oct 2016 5:02 AM, "Renee Sun" wrote: >=20 >> need some general advises please... >>=20 >> our infra is built with multiple webapps with tomcat ... the scale = layer is >> archived on top of those webapps which work hand-in-hand with solr = admin >> APIs / shard queries / commit or optimize / core management etc etc. >>=20 >> While I have not get a chance to actually play with solr 5 yet, just = by >> imagination, we will be facing some huge changes in our infra to be = able to >> upgrade to solr 5, yes? >>=20 >> Thanks >> Renee >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. >> nabble.com/solr-5-leaving-tomcat-will-I-be-the-only-one- >> fearing-about-this-tp4300065.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>=20 --Apple-Mail=_3BA3A8C1-8435-45EA-9103-7272F014759C--