Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA70200BB2 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 00:30:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6A468160AE3; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B17EB160ADD for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 00:30:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 67920 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2016 22:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67904 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2016 22:30:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:30:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0B4FFC0185 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:30:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=paperthin-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R3T-dX-mE20W for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com (mail-qk0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CC8955F570 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z190so167110940qkc.2 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paperthin-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KnSqcbf+Sl5zEYhCfJABQaDbWVA9ZPP0J/SnqQDrUXQ=; b=O+oSHvcqB492fC3zuerJX7icwj3V+Fz0qWjgie8qnQl6MNk9qRgClXVc3tm8Pl514j hIvQyfGSm1IA0tqd3GwxrBmLuT8Ur159kRq0NsgQGgRKFqiMZ5RA5HChG/mpoPiGhiKX wINEni7nBZYZFlwvIsdyv6Q1wpIHFI/MDuNMRWoGaHTSh6GGCvYZ+znQvMhH06Ao2bAd BLIRXMjPpkh/PAyO0znNw+4Rj/rT+fflnN3q9Ika0sa0rErPYKnz172bWcqHuLtJTjJh 88f66GiAk9ihxLWusgpm5H8CydyIcCPY5VBoUWXon9o4hC5hJ0yhpdupesuvu3rcA0up rDbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KnSqcbf+Sl5zEYhCfJABQaDbWVA9ZPP0J/SnqQDrUXQ=; b=JLzY4hjP2ezHoGcaQUZ0dW6EbFBTfp1mpSzRbOZy/csx3RhMjJtwOh0BaOTNgM6I/O qyiQTEAD9B/AIN3jdQlwCFKDunXV5TFucwjcJ+j2uQAobsRmtpSJ1iT23TBJWby0AY2m PchsZeU7cxlUqNZGU1VhUGyHkj9zjf3WEm3ITDe4Gm0WZOi6etFaSO9VtGso1ItTj7vX y8t9lCArsBNtuZkD4aWSWYhIk1hwvrSqA0ife7GR9B8AxA56PY1AhGy5vo/TmqAIeqnc 19UhBLirGzeTD3ZRo7RpiaA7mRoYKEZAlLQrFRuBahynYlVT7wzjqO29gwyAZGRSIAf8 qh3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmfLmX9VpIXseo9YYiJS61moAEWOSHZwJ7KgtRA7NIKgxqCnyVhp8YE3LKvVwujuw== X-Received: by 10.55.174.2 with SMTP id x2mr16032412qke.63.1476484241820; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([64.222.250.58]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p22sm8684487qka.43.2016.10.14.15.30.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:30:40 -0700 (PDT) To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org From: Tim Parker Subject: Configuration options/concerns for multiple Solr versions Message-ID: <76c9e8c4-1843-6ddc-a70d-97eb1bde9ef2@paperthin.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:30:39 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 22:30:52 -0000 We have a ColdFusion-based CMS product which can interface with Solr for search functionality. ColdFusion ships with an ancient version of Solr (old enough that it crashes when the search criteria includes a leading wildcard), so to get current Solr functionality... we have to interface directly to Solr. We don't bundle Solr with our product, so it's important to be able to interface to as wide a variety of Solr releases as possible. Our initial implementation used Solr 4.10.2, and includes customizations in schema.xml and solrconfig.xml. We have since made some minor changes for compatibility with Solr 5.x, but our goal is to minimize the version-specific information so we can create new cores without having to worry about what Solr version is in play. Aside from keeping the luceneMatchVersion setting in agreement with the actual Solr release in use, what other configuration and/or schema changes do we need to worry about? [enhancement request: set luceneMatchVersion to the running version if it's not found in solrconfig.xml - and/or allow a setting of 'current' so this doesn't have to be touched without specific reason to do so - any thoughts? Am I missing something?] -- Tim Parker Senior Engineer PaperThin, Inc. 300 Congress Street, Suite 303 Quincy, MA 02169 Ph: 617.471.4440 x203 CommonSpot helps organizations improve engagement across the web, mobile devices, and social media outlets to achieve better marketing results. Find out what's new in CommonSpot at www.paperthin.com.