lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: (ANNOUNCEMENT) Solr Examples reading group
Date Fri, 07 Oct 2016 23:51:14 GMT
Personally I'd like an XML formatter as part of the checkin process ;)...

But that's not my point. In any "replace configs" discussion, we need to be
aware of the many different environments that are out there "in the wild".
An indentation-sensitive format like YAML brings with it its own problems.
One of them is that if I don't have my editor set to use spaces I've introduced
errors. At least with a format that has structure you can format it ugly without
changing its meaning.

Best,
Erick

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Rick Leir <rleir@leirtech.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-10-07 01:04 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>>
>> Rick:
>> ..
>> I've seen a _lot_ of configs in the wild with weird indentation, they
>> tend to get that way because there are lots of situations I've seen
>> where people edit them through some kind of remote terminal and can
>> only edit in some vi-like editor. Which may be customized a zillion
>> different ways in terms of how indentation is handled. That's
>> something that we'd need to be sensitive to when considering an
>> indentation-sensitive format.
>
> I commonly do a diff of the xmls to see what has changed in a new release,
> or what differs in an example.  The indentation is often 'tidied up' in
> different ways, making the diff almost useless. Perhaps I need to run an xml
> formatter before doing any diff's on xml's. Also, perhaps the Solr
> committers could agree to standardize on an xml formatter.
>
> Sorry for warping this thread so far: When you comment out a swatch of XML,
> you need to allow for embedded comments. That is less troublesome with some
> other flavours of config file.
>>
>>
>> Erick
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Rick Leir <rleir@leirtech.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for using the word bewildering, I agree.
>>>
>>>
>>> While we are talking of simplifying solrconfig.xml, may I mention YAML? I
>>> find the YAML format so much more readable than XML.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have not looked at the code which reads the config, so I do not know
>>> how
>>> big a change it is to use cfg4j and read in YAML.
>>>
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message