Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1468822107478-4287600.post@n3.nabble.com>
References: <1354757700663-4024660.post@n3.nabble.com> <1468822107478-4287600.post@n3.nabble.com>
From: Susheel Kumar <susheel2777@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:31:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJuqOKKFcdLe=T2UfB3VH8cZ5z=PP_XvmKNvDqjXx_+cy6FWbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SolrCloud - Query performance degrades with multiple servers(Shards)
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147da509ef8590537e8fba1
archived-at: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:31:31 -0000

--001a1147da509ef8590537e8fba1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello,

Question:  Do you really need sharding/can live without sharding since you
mentioned only 10K records in one shard. What's your index/document size?

Thanks,
Susheel

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:08 AM, kasimjinwala <jinwala.kasim@gmail.com>
wrote:

> currently I am using solrCloud 5.0 and I am facing query performance issue
> while using 3 implicit shards, each shard contain around 10K records.
> when I am specifying shards parameter(*shards=shard1*) in query it gives
> 30K-35K qps. but while removing shards parameter from query it give
> *1000-1500qps*. performance decreases drastically.
>
> please provide comment or suggestion to solve above issue
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Query-performance-degrades-with-multiple-servers-tp4024660p4287600.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--001a1147da509ef8590537e8fba1--