Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6504200ACA for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 23:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E4F69160A58; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BA3D160A29 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 23:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8224 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2016 21:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 8207 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2016 21:41:59 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:41:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EA266C0773 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:41:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.38 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.38 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, KAM_COUK=1.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oE7y2If2mXzd for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2C3775F19D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3361921C25 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:41:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=ZrFge7a4FRAv3OO MxzeqqdAtGj4=; b=s5KOOya16k8NbTRqrVshgCx8/VKOdb8j9cvA9KvMN6xCdWv 8HlDiVQMGMeRD49vupwU7AIzujvJXQVnnPd7N+P/AA+bBe86omIneY5/TJZ3cKwK az7HY8/zTHNSPO2v+RUGYZLg/yVAXbL34ZIW5jpbKuGGeVaAVcAa2R1OtKC0= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 037BFCC1B3; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:41:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1465508514.486640.633221521.3DB5EFD1@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: T0ODjOKhqtBe2Y//q4APgTKR5KYNe5KGRCyalKYKkj8I 1465508514 From: Upayavira To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-aff28cd1 Subject: Re: Solutions for Multi-word Synonyms Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:41:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: archived-at: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:42:02 -0000 Here's a recently created ticket that covers this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9185 Let's hope we see some traction on it soon, as many people suffer from this issue. Upayavira On Thu, 9 Jun 2016, at 09:10 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Joe Lawson < > jlawson@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > > > The auth-phrasing-token (APT) filter is a two pronged solution that > > requires index and query time processes versus hon-lucene-synonyms (HLS) > > which is strictly a query time implementation. The primary take away from > > that is, APT requires reindexing your data when you update the autophrases > > and synonyms while HLS does not. > > > > > Yup, understood about the indexing, that is not a big issue for us as we > rarely change the synonym list and re-index frequently. > > MJ > > > Sent with MailTrack >