lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From MaryJo Sminkey <mjsmin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
Date Thu, 02 Jun 2016 18:24:51 GMT
Ah yes I did misunderstand the question, I thought he was just saying the
count was not the same as what the facet in the first query had returned.

MJ



On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Robert Brown <rob@intelcompute.com> wrote:

> MaryJo, I think you've mis-understood.  The counts are different simply
> because the 2nd query contains an filter of a facet value from the 1st
> query - that's completely expected.
>
> The issue is how to get the original facet counts (with no filters but
> same q) in the same call as also filtering by one of those facet values.
>
> Personally I don't think it's possible, but will be interested to hear
> others input, since it's a very common situation for me - I cache the first
> result in memcached and tag future queries as related to the first.
>
> Or could you always make 2 calls back to Solr (one original (again), and
> one with the filters), the caches should help massively.
>
>
>
> On 02/06/16 19:07, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
>
>> And you're saying the count for the second query is different than what
>> was
>> returned in the facet? You may need to check for any defaults you have set
>> up in the solrconfig for the select parser, if for instance you have any
>> grouping going on, but aren't doing grouping in your facet, that could
>> result in the counts being off.
>>
>> MJ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Jamal, Sarfaraz <
>> Sarfaraz.Jamal@verizonwireless.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely,
>>>
>>> Here is what it looks like:
>>>
>>> This brings the right counts as it should
>>> http://
>>>
>>> **********select?q=video&hl=true&hl.fl=*&hl.snippets=20&facet=true&facet.field=team
>>>
>>> Then when I specify which team
>>> http://
>>>
>>> **********select?q=video&hl=true&hl.fl=*&hl.snippets=20&facet=true&facet.field=team&fq=team:rollback
>>>
>>> The counts are obviously different now, as the result set is limited to
>>> one team.
>>>
>>> Sas
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsminkey@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
>>>
>>> Jamai - what is your q= set to? And do you have a fq for the original
>>> query? I have found that if you do a wildcard search (*.*) you have to be
>>> careful about other parameters you set as that can often result in the
>>> numbers returned being off. In my case, my defaults had things like
>>> edismax
>>> settings for phrase boosting, etc. that don't apply if there isn't a
>>> search
>>> term, and once I removed those for a wildcard search I got the correct
>>> numbers. So possibly your facet query itself may be set up correctly but
>>> something else in the parameters and/or filters with the two queries may
>>> be
>>> the cause of the difference.
>>>
>>> Mary Jo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Jamal, Sarfaraz <
>>> Sarfaraz.Jamal@verizonwireless.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I am working on implementing some basic faceting into my project.
>>>>
>>>> I have it working the way I want to, but I feel like there is probably
>>>> a better way the way I went about it.
>>>>
>>>> * I want to show a category and its count.
>>>> * when someone clicks a category, it sets a FQ= to that category.
>>>>
>>>> But now that the results are being filtered, the category counts from
>>>> the original query without the filters are off.
>>>>
>>>> So, I have a single api call that I make with rows set to 0 and the
>>>> base query without any filters, and use that to display my categories.
>>>>
>>>> And then I call the api again, this time to get the results. And the
>>>> category count is the same.
>>>>
>>>> I hope that makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> I was hoping  facet.query would be of help, but I am not sure I
>>>> understood it properly.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance =)
>>>>
>>>> Sas
>>>>
>>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message