lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lisheng Zhang <lz0522...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Using solr with increasing complicated access control
Date Thu, 02 Jun 2016 00:07:40 GMT
Erick, very sorry that i misspelled your name earlier! later i read more
and found that lucene seemed to implement approach 2/ (search a few times
and combine results), i guess when joining becomes complicated the
performance may suffer? later i will try to study more,

thanks for helps, Lisheng

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Lisheng Zhang <lz0522y2k@gmail.com> wrote:

> Eric: thanks very much for your quick response (somehow msg was sent to
> spam initially, sorry about that)
>
> yes the rules has to be complicated beyond my control, we also tried to
> filter after search, but after data amount grows, it becomes slow ..
>
> Rightnow lucene has feature like document block or join to simulate
> relational database behavior, did lucene implement join by:
>
> 1/ internally flatten out documents to generate one new document
> 2/ or search more than once, then merge results
> 3/ or better way i could not see?
>
> For now i only need a high level understanding, thanks for your helps,
> Lisheng
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I know this seems facetious, but.... Talk to your
>> clients about _why_ they want such increasingly
>> complex access requirements. Often the logic
>> is pretty flawed for the complexity. Things like
>> "allow user X to see document Y if they're part of
>> groups A, B, C but not D or E unless they are
>> also part of sub-group F and it's raining outside"...
>>
>> If the rules _must_ be complicated, that's what
>> post-filters were actually invented for. Pretty often
>> I'll build in some "bailout" because whatever you
>> build has, eventually, to deal with the system
>> admin searching all documents, i.e. doing the
>> ACL calcs for every document.
>>
>> Best,
>> Erick
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Lisheng Zhang <lz0522y2k@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi, i have been using solr for many years and it is VERY helpful.
>> >
>> > My problem is that our app has an increasingly more complicated access
>> > control to satisfy client's requirement, in solr/lucene  it means we
>> need
>> > to add more and more fields into each document and use more and more
>> > complicated filter conditions, so code is hard to maintain and indexing
>> > becomes a serious issue because we want to search as real time as
>> possible.
>> >
>> > I would appreciate a high level guidance on how to deal with this issue?
>> > recently i investigated mySQL fulltext search (our app uses mySQL),
>> using
>> > mySQL means we simply reuse DB for access control, but mySQL fulltext
>> > search performance is far from ideal compared to solr.
>> >
>> > Thanks very much for helps, Lisheng
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message